Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Dec 1;7(4):520-4.
eCollection 2008.

The effect of stimulus anticipation on the interpolated twitch technique

Affiliations

The effect of stimulus anticipation on the interpolated twitch technique

Duane C Button et al. J Sports Sci Med. .

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of expected and unexpected interpolated stimuli (IT) during a maximum voluntary contraction on quadriceps force output and activation. Two groups of male subjects who were either inexperienced (MI: no prior experience with IT tests) or experienced (ME: previously experienced 10 or more series of IT tests) received an expected or unexpected IT while performing quadriceps isometric maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs). Measurements included MVC force, quadriceps and hamstrings electromyographic (EMG) activity, and quadriceps inactivation as measured by the interpolated twitch technique (ITT). When performing MVCs with the expectation of an IT, the knowledge or lack of knowledge of an impending IT occurring during a contraction did not result in significant overall differences in force, ITT inactivation, quadriceps or hamstrings EMG activity. However, the expectation of an IT significantly (p ¼ 0.0001) reduced MVC force (9.5%) and quadriceps EMG activity (14.9%) when compared to performing MVCs with prior knowledge that stimulation would not occur. While ME exhibited non-significant decreases when expecting an IT during a MVC, MI force and EMG activity significantly decreased 12.4% and 20.9% respectively. Overall, ME had significantly (p ¼ 0.0001) higher force (14.5%) and less ITT inactivation (10.4%) than MI. The expectation of the noxious stimuli may account for the significant decrements in force and activation during the ITT. Key pointsA single orientation session may not be adequate for a valid estimation of muscle activation using the ITT.The expectation of an electrical stimulation whether delivered or not can impair performance.The validity of the ITT for estimating the extent of full muscle activation must be viewed with caution, since the expectation of IT discomfort may inhibit the individual's ability to exert maximum force, especially with inexperienced participants.

Keywords: Muscle activation; electromyography; evoked stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The figure illustrates the interpolated twitch technique (ITT) which was used with a maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) to estimate the extent of inactivation during a voluntary contraction by comparing the amplitudes of evoked doublets superimposed upon a MVC, with the post-contraction potentiated doublet (interpolated doublet amplitude / potentiated doublet amplitude x 100 = percentage of muscle inactivation).

References

    1. Allen G.M., Gandevia S.C., McKenzie D.K. (1995) Reliability of measurements of muscle strength and voluntary activation using twitch interpolation. Muscle and Nerve 118, 593-600 - PubMed
    1. Behm D.G., St-Pierre D.M.M. (1997) The muscle activation force relationship is unaffected by ischaemic recovery. Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology 222, 468-478 - PubMed
    1. Behm D.G. (1995) Neuromuscular implications and applications of resistance training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 99, 264-274
    1. Behm D.G., Anderson K., Curnew R.S. (2002a) Muscle force and activation under stable and unstable conditions. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 116, 154-162 - PubMed
    1. Behm D.G., Button D., Butt J. (2001a) Factors affecting force loss with stretching. Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology 226, 262-272 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources