Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Sep 1;8(3):366-73.
eCollection 2009.

Accountability systems and instructional approaches in youth volleyball training

Affiliations

Accountability systems and instructional approaches in youth volleyball training

Felismina Pereira et al. J Sports Sci Med. .

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine accountability systems operating in youth volleyball training sessions and to understand how those systems vary according to the instructional tasks and the nature of the information provided by coaches. Additionally, the interactive effect of the players' age group on accountability systems and instructional tasks will be inspected. Twenty-eight youth volleyball coaches (for under 14s and under 18s) were observed, one training session each. Systematic observation strategies were used to describe and analyse task presentation and task structure during practice. Results convey that the accountability systems implemented by coaches were mainly implicit and governed by opportunity rather than explicit performance criteria imparted in task presentation. Remarks on the quality of performance only occurred during ongoing practice. More often than not coaches showed no reaction when athletes did not accomplish the tasks, failing to convey consequential expectancy-demand-monitoring messages. The instructional approach was predominantly composed of informing tasks, of technical nature and general information, which can reflect a technique and generalist coach profile. These results indicate the presence of weak and ambiguous accountability system, also corroborated by positive correlations of extending tasks with the category without exigency task presentation as well as with no reaction to unaccomplished tasks. There were no notorious differences in accountability behaviours between players' age group. Key pointsAccountability systems implemented by coaches were mainly implicit and governed by opportunity rather than explicit performance criteria imparted in task presentation. Only during practice, coaches remark the performance quality, followed by participation/effort.The instructional approach was predominantly composed of informing tasks, of technical nature and general information, which can reflect a technique and generalist coach profile.In general, coaches did not differentiate accountability behaviours according to the players' age group.

Keywords: Accountability; coaching; instruction; volleyball; youth sport.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Balderson D.W., Sharpe T. (2005) The effects of personal accountability and personal responsibility instruction on select off-task and positive social behaviors. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 24, 66-87
    1. Bianco M.A. (2006) Capacidades cognitivas nas modalidades esportivas coletivas. Modalidades esportivas colectivas de Rose Dante., Junior Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara, Koogan; 24-39 (In Portugal).
    1. Black S.J., Weiss M.R. (1992) The relationship among perceived coaching behaviour, perceptions of ability, and motivation in competitive age group swimmers’. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 14, 309-325
    1. Brophy J., Good T. (1986) Teacher behaviour and student achievment. Handbook of research on teaching. 3rd Edition Wittrock M.New York: Macmillan Publishing Company; 328-375
    1. Cohen J. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edition L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J

LinkOut - more resources