Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Sep 1;8(3):463-7.
eCollection 2009.

Effect of the rotor crank system on cycling performance

Simon A Jobson  1 , James Hopker, Andrew Galbraith, Damian A Coleman, Alan M Nevill
Affiliations

Effect of the rotor crank system on cycling performance

Simon A Jobson et al. J Sports Sci Med. .

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a novel crank system on laboratory time-trial cycling performance. The Rotor system makes each pedal independent from the other so that the cranks are no longer fixed at 180°. Twelve male competitive but non-elite cyclists (mean ± s: 35 ± 7 yr, Wmax = 363 ± 38 W, VO2peak = 4.5 ± 0.3 L·min(-1)) completed 6-weeks of their normal training using either a conventional (CON) or the novel Rotor (ROT) pedal system. All participants then completed two 40.23-km time-trials on an air-braked ergometer, one using CON and one using ROT. Mean performance speeds were not different between trials (CON = 41.7 km·h(-1) vs. ROT = 41.6 km·h(-1), P > 0.05). Indeed, the pedal system used during the time-trials had no impact on any of the measured variables (power output, cadence, heart rate, VO2, RER, gross efficiency). Furthermore, the ANOVA identified no significant interaction effect between main effects (Time-trial crank system*Training crank system, P > 0.05). To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to examine the effects of the Rotor system on endurance performance rather than endurance capacity. These results suggest that the Rotor system has no measurable impact on time-trial performance. However, further studies should examine the importance of the Rotor 'regulation point' and the suggestion that the Rotor system has acute ergogenic effects if used infrequently. Key pointsThe Rotor crank system does not improve gross efficiency in well-trained cyclists.The Rotor crank system has no measurable impact on laboratory 40.23-km time-trial performance.A 6-week period of familiarisation does not increase the effectiveness of the Rotor crank system.

Keywords: Gross efficiency; bicycle equipment; cycling performance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Interaction between training pedal system (CONtrain vs. ROTtrain) and time-trial condition (CONTT vs. ROTT) on mean VO2.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baguley T. (2004) Understanding statistical power in the context of applied research. Applied Ergonomics 35, 73-80 - PubMed
    1. Bertucci W., Duc S., Villerius V., Pernin J.N., Grappe F. (2005a) Validity and reliability of the PowerTap mobile cycling powermeter when compared with the SRM Device. International Journal of Sports Medicine 26(10), 868-73 - PubMed
    1. Bertucci W., Grappe F., Girard A., Betik A., Rouillon J.D. (2005b) Effects on the crank torque profile when changing pedalling cadence in level ground and uphill road cycling. Journal of Biomechanics 38, 1003-1010 - PubMed
    1. Coast J., Cox R., Welch H. (1986) Optimal pedalling rate in prolonged bouts of cycle ergometry. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 18, 225-230 - PubMed
    1. Cohen J. (1988) Statistical power analysis for behavioural sciences. 2nd edition. Academic Press, New York

LinkOut - more resources