Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Aug;31(3):75-80.

Evolution of Point-of-Care Testing in Australia

Affiliations
Review

Evolution of Point-of-Care Testing in Australia

Rosy Tirimacco. Clin Biochem Rev. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

Currently no mandatory standards or guidelines exist for Point-of-Care Testing (PoCT) in Australia. In 2001, a report on the role and value of 'near patient testing' in general practice outlined work that was required to assist the Australian Government to decide how to manage PoCT. Phillips Fox reported that adoption of mandatory accreditation requirements was not justified by the level of risk associated with PoCT. If implemented appropriately, PoCT could be useful with frontline management of chronic disease, relieving stress on general practice and expanding the reach of pathology. Interim PoCT standards in general practice were developed by a Quality Use of Pathology committee, and formed an accreditation framework for the PoCT in General Practice Trial. This trial concluded that PoCT has a role in supporting the primary healthcare team to manage chronic disease patients. While results of the trial are still being considered, the potential impact of funding PoCT in general practice is being treated as part of the wider review of pathology funding currently taking place in Australia. Although Australia has local models from which to draw experience, it has yet to decide the quality framework it would adopt if it was to roll out PoCT in general practice. The quality framework that Australia adopts for PoCT must achieve high quality pathology results that enhance clinical care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Department of Health and Ageing – NPAAC Functions http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/health-npa... (Accessed 2 March 2010).
    1. Nichols JH. Point of care testing. Clin Lab Med. 2007;27:893–908. - PubMed
    1. NATA 2009–2010 Fee Schedule. Category M Laboratories (Medical Practice) (from 1 July 2009 to 30 June 2010) http://www.nata.asn.au/phocadownload/publications/fee_schedules/Fee_sche... (Accessed 2 March 2010).
    1. Guilbert R, Schattner P, Sikaris K, Churilov L, Leibowitz R, Matthews M. Review of the Role and Value of Near Patient Testing in General Practice. Report to the Pathology Section, Diagnostics and Technology Branch, Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care. 2001
    1. Report on a Review of the Level of Public Health Risk and Adequacy of Controls Over Non-Medicare Pathology Services. Volume 1 http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/59A0DBDD43... (Accessed 2 March 2010)

LinkOut - more resources