Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct 10:7:327-34.
doi: 10.4137/BBI.S12844. eCollection 2013.

Automatic identification of algal community from microscopic images

Natchimuthu Santhi  1 , Chinnaraj Pradeepa, Parthasarathy Subashini, Senthil Kalaiselvi
Affiliations

Automatic identification of algal community from microscopic images

Natchimuthu Santhi et al. Bioinform Biol Insights. .

Abstract

A good understanding of the population dynamics of algal communities is crucial in several ecological and pollution studies of freshwater and oceanic systems. This paper reviews the subsequent introduction to the automatic identification of the algal communities using image processing techniques from microscope images. The diverse techniques of image preprocessing, segmentation, feature extraction and recognition are considered one by one and their parameters are summarized. Automatic identification and classification of algal community are very difficult due to various factors such as change in size and shape with climatic changes, various growth periods, and the presence of other microbes. Therefore, the significance, uniqueness, and various approaches are discussed and the analyses in image processing methods are evaluated. Algal identification and associated problems in water organisms have been projected as challenges in image processing application. Various image processing approaches based on textures, shapes, and an object boundary, as well as some segmentation methods like, edge detection and color segmentations, are highlighted. Finally, artificial neural networks and some machine learning algorithms were used to classify and identifying the algae. Further, some of the benefits and drawbacks of schemes are examined.

Keywords: Algae identification; feature extraction; identification; neural network; segmentation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proposed methodology of automatic algal identification.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pre processed images by various filters. Note: The original images were collected from Algal Resource Database, Microbial cluture collection, National Institute for Environmental Studies. http://www.shigen.nig.ac.jp/algae/.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Edge detection methods.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Mansoor H, Sorayya M, Aishah S, Moshleh MAA. Automatic recognition system for some cyanobacteria using image processing techniques and ANN approach. 2011 International Conference on Environmental and Computer Science. 2011;19:73–8.
    1. Anton A. Malayan Nature Society. Intern Development and Research Centre of Canada; 1991. Algae in the conservation and management of freshwaters.
    1. Culverhouse PF, Williams R, Benfield M, et al. Automatic image analysis of plankton: future perspectives. Mar Ecol Progr Ser. 2006;312:297–309.
    1. Weeks PJD, Gauld ID, Gaston KJ, O’Neill MA. Automating the identification of insects: a new solution to an old problem. Bull Entomol Res. 1997;87(2):203–11.
    1. Culverhouse PF, Williams R, Reguera B, Herry V, González-Gil S. Do experts make mistakes? A comparison of human and machine identification of dinoflagellates. Mar Ecol Progr Ser. 2003;247:17–25.

LinkOut - more resources