Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Oct 18:4:311.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00311. eCollection 2013.

Epstein-Barr virus-driven lymphomagenesis in the context of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection

Affiliations
Review

Epstein-Barr virus-driven lymphomagenesis in the context of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection

Maria R Petrara et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a ubiquitous human γ-herpes virus which establishes a life-long asymptomatic infection in immunocompetent hosts. In human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infected patients, the impaired immunosurveillance against EBV may favor the development of EBV-related diseases, ranging from lymphoproliferative disorders to B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has significantly modified the natural course of HIV-1 infection, resulting in decreased HIV-1 plasmaviremia, increased CD4 lymphocytes, and decreased opportunistic infections, indicating a restoration of immune functions. However, the impact of ART appears to be less favorable on EBV-related malignancies than on other AIDS-defining tumors, such as Kaposi's sarcoma, and NHL remains the most common cancer during the ART era. EBV-driven tumors are associated with selective expression of latent oncogenic proteins, but uncontrolled lytic cycle with virus replication and/or reactivation may favor cell transformation, at least in the early phases. Several host's factors may promote EBV reactivation and replication; besides immunodepression, inflammation/chronic immune stimulation may play an important role. Microbial pathogen-associated molecular patterns and endogenous damage-associated molecular patterns, through Toll-like receptors, activate the immune system and may promote EBV reactivation and/or polyclonal expansion of EBV-infected cells. A body of evidence suggests that chronic immune stimulation is a hallmark of HIV-1 pathogenesis and may persist even in ART-treated patients. This review focuses on lymphomagenesis driven by EBV both in the context of the natural history of HIV-1 infection and in ART-treated patients. Understanding the mechanisms involved in the expansion of EBV-infected cells is a premise for the identification of prognostic markers of EBV-associated malignancies.

Keywords: B cell activation; EBV; EBV lytic reactivation; EBV-related malignancies; HIV-1; antiretroviral therapy; chronic immune activation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Mechanisms potentially contributing to polyclonal B cell activation and expansion of EBV-infected B cells in HIV-1 infected patients. HIV-1 acts as both a direct or indirect activator of B cells. Direct effects of HIV-1 include binding to B cells of HIV-1 viral proteins, such as gp120, Tat, and Nef, promoting polyclonal B cell activation. Indirect effects result from HIV-1-induced immune activation. Breakdown of gut mucosa induced by HIV-1 antigens increases intestinal permeability, resulting in translocation of microbial products. Pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), such as LPS, 16S rDNA, and CpG DNA, and endogenous molecules created upon tissue injury (damage-associated molecular patterns, DAMPs), such as mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), defensins and high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein, by engaging Toll-like receptors (TLRs) activate signaling cascade leading to increased transcription of pro-inflammatory cytokines. In this context, both EBV-infected and uninfected B cells are activated and may undergo proliferation; EBV-infected cells may overcome uninfected ones due to higher replicative capacity and telomerase activation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ambinder R. F., Bhatia K., Martinez-Maza O., Mitsuyasu R. (2010). Cancer biomarkers in HIV patients. Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS 5 531–53610.1097/COH.0b013e32833f327e - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anselmi A., Vendrame D., Rampon O., Giaquinto C., Zanchetta M, De Rossi A. (2007). Immune reconstitution in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children with different virological responses to anti-retroviral therapy. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 150 442–45010.1111/j.1365-2249.2007.03526.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Audigé A., Schlaepfer E., von Wyl V., Miller R. C., Vernazza P., Nadal D., et al. (2010). B cells from HIV-infected patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma display an activated phenotype and have a blunted TNF-α response to TLR9 triggering. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 26 1063–107410.1089/aid.2009.0288 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baiocchi R. A., Caligiuri M. A. (1994). Low-dose interleukin 2 prevents the development of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-associated lymphoproliferative disease in scid/scid mice reconstituted i.p. with EBV-seropositive human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91 5577–5581 10.1073/pnas.91.12.5577 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beral V., Newton R. (1998). Overview of the epidemiology of immunodeficiency-associated cancers. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 23 1–610.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a024164 - DOI - PubMed