The impact of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) fasting glucose diagnostic criterion on the prevalence and outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus in Han Chinese women
- PMID: 24152069
- DOI: 10.1111/dme.12349
The impact of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) fasting glucose diagnostic criterion on the prevalence and outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus in Han Chinese women
Abstract
Aims: The International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) proposed that a one-time value of fasting plasma glucose of 5.1 mmol/l or over at any time of the pregnancy is sufficient to diagnose gestational diabetes. We evaluated the repercussions of the application of this threshold in pregnant Han Chinese women.
Methods: This is a retrospective study of 5360 (72.3% of total) consecutively recruited pregnant Han Chinese women in one centre from 2008 to 2011. These women underwent a two-step gestational diabetes diagnostic protocol according to the previous American Diabetes Association criteria. The IADPSG fasting plasma glucose criterion was used to reclassify these 5360 women. The prevalence, clinical characteristics and obstetric outcomes were compared among the women classified as having gestational diabetes by the previous American Diabetes Association criteria (approximately 90% were treated), those reclassified as having gestational diabetes by the single IADPSG fasting plasma glucose criterion (untreated), but not as having gestational diabetes by the previous American Diabetes Association criteria, and those with normal glucose tolerance.
Results: There were 626 cases of gestational diabetes defined by the previous American Diabetes Association criteria (11.7%) and these cases were associated with increased risks of maternal and neonatal outcomes when compared with the women with normal glucose tolerance. With the IADPSG fasting plasma glucose criterion, another 1314 (24.5%) women were reclassified as having gestational diabetes. Gestational diabetes classified by the IADPSG fasting plasma glucose criterion was associated with gestational hypertension (P = 0.0094) and neonatal admission to nursery (P = 0.035) prior to adjustment for maternal age and BMI, but was no longer a predictor for adverse pregnancy outcomes after adjustment.
Conclusion: The simple IADPSG fasting plasma glucose criterion increased the Chinese population with gestational diabetes by 200%. The increased population with gestational diabetes was not significantly associated with excess obstetric and neonatal morbidity.
© 2013 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine © 2013 Diabetes UK.
Similar articles
-
Have pregnancy outcomes improved with the introduction of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria in Japan?J Diabetes Investig. 2020 Jul;11(4):994-1001. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13223. Epub 2020 Mar 1. J Diabetes Investig. 2020. PMID: 32012487 Free PMC article.
-
[Comparison of the diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus in China].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Aug;46(8):578-81. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2011. PMID: 22169514 Chinese.
-
Association between hyperglycaemia and adverse perinatal outcomes in south Asian and white British women: analysis of data from the Born in Bradford cohort.Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015 Oct;3(10):795-804. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00255-7. Epub 2015 Sep 6. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015. PMID: 26355010 Free PMC article.
-
Application of One-Step IADPSG Versus Two-Step Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes in the Real World: Impact on Health Services, Clinical Care, and Outcomes.Curr Diab Rep. 2017 Aug 10;17(10):85. doi: 10.1007/s11892-017-0922-z. Curr Diab Rep. 2017. PMID: 28799123 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Association between gestational diabetes mellitus diagnostic criteria and adverse pregnancy outcomes-a systematic review and meta-analysis of adjusted effect sizes from studies using current diagnostic criteria.BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 21;14(11):e091258. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091258. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39578035 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in urban and rural Tamil Nadu using IADPSG and WHO 1999 criteria (WINGS 6).Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 Apr 5;2:8. doi: 10.1186/s40842-016-0028-6. eCollection 2016. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016. PMID: 28702243 Free PMC article.
-
The Sex Specific Association Between Maternal Gestational Diabetes and Offspring Metabolic Status at 1 Year of Age.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Feb 9;11:608125. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.608125. eCollection 2020. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021. PMID: 33633685 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in serum adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein in women with gestational diabetes mellitus and normal pregnant women during mid- and late pregnancy.J Diabetes Investig. 2016 Sep;7(5):797-804. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12484. Epub 2016 Feb 24. J Diabetes Investig. 2016. PMID: 27181269 Free PMC article.
-
Short Body Height and Pre-pregnancy Overweight for Increased Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Population-Based Cohort Study.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018 Jun 26;9:349. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00349. eCollection 2018. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018. PMID: 29997576 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence and trend of preterm birth in China, 1990-2016: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 12;10(12):e039303. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039303. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 33310797 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources