Comparison of two aspiration techniques of bronchoalveolar lavage in children
- PMID: 24155175
- PMCID: PMC3999312
- DOI: 10.1002/ppul.22916
Comparison of two aspiration techniques of bronchoalveolar lavage in children
Abstract
Background: Although bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) via flexible bronchoscopy is an essential diagnostic tool, its technique is not standardized in children. Our objective was to compare two different aspiration techniques of BAL in children (continuous wall suction vs. handheld syringe suction) in regards to the percentage of fluid recovered and the odds of performing a technically acceptable procedure (i.e., >40% of volume return).
Methods: We conducted a review of all pediatric flexible bronchoscopies with BAL conducted at our institution over a 2-year period. To minimize the differences between groups at baseline and reduce the possibility of bias, we used one-to-one propensity score (PS) caliper matching with no replacement for statistical analyses.
Results: We identified 539 procedures that met pre-specified criteria. There were considerable covariate imbalances between procedures in the handheld syringe group (n = 147) and those in the continuous wall group (n = 392); however, these imbalances were substantially reduced after the PS matching. In the matched sample (n = 236), children in the handheld syringe group had ∼7% higher volume return (95% CI = 3.4-11.0, P < 0.001) from BAL and threefold higher odds (95% CI = 1.5-8.6, P = 0.002) of performing a technically acceptable procedure.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that handheld syringe suction offers a higher percentage of volume return from BAL and increases the odds of performing a technically acceptable procedure in children when compared to continuous wall suction.
Keywords: bronchoalveolar lavage; bronchoscopy; children; propensity score.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Wall-mounted Versus Handheld Syringe Suction for Pediatric Bronchoalveolar Lavage: A Randomized Controlled Trial.J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2021 Jul 1;28(3):201-208. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000734. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2021. PMID: 33177439 Clinical Trial.
-
Site of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Via Flexible Bronchoscopy and Fluid Return in Children.J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2016 Jul;23(3):210-4. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000287. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2016. PMID: 27261935
-
Comparison of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid obtained by manual aspiration with a handheld syringe with that obtained by automated suction pump aspiration from healthy dogs.Am J Vet Res. 2014 Jan;75(1):85-90. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.75.1.85. Am J Vet Res. 2014. PMID: 24370250
-
Diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia: focus on nonbronchoscopic techniques (nonbronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage, including mini-BAL, blinded protected specimen brush, and blinded bronchial sampling) and endotracheal aspirates.J Intensive Care Med. 2006 Jan-Feb;21(1):17-21. doi: 10.1177/0885066605283094. J Intensive Care Med. 2006. PMID: 16698740 Review.
-
Utility of bronchoscopy in immunocompromised paediatric patients: Systematic review.Paediatr Respir Rev. 2020 Apr;34:24-34. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 Feb 29. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2020. PMID: 32247829
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [Date last accessed: February 1, 2013];10 Leading Causes of Death by Age Group, United States – 2010. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/pdf/10LCID_All_Deaths_By_Age_Group_201....
-
- Connett GJ. Bronchoalveolar lavage. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2000;1(1):52–56. - PubMed
-
- Wood RE. The diagnostic effectiveness of the flexible bronchoscope in children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1985;1(4):188–192. - PubMed
-
- Balfour-Lynn IM, Spencer H. Bronchoscopy--how and when? Paediatr Respir Rev. 2002;3(3):255–264. - PubMed
-
- Bush A. Bronchoscopy in paediatric intensive care. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2003;4(1):67–73. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous