Randomized control trial of composite cuspal restorations: five-year results

Abstract

The objective of this randomized control trial was to compare the five-year clinical performance of direct and indirect resin composite restorations replacing cusps. In 157 patients, 176 restorations were made to restore maxillary premolars with Class II cavities and one missing cusp. Ninety-two direct and 84 indirect resin composite restorations were placed by two operators, following a strict protocol. Treatment technique and operator were assigned randomly. Follow-up period was at least 4.5 yrs. Survival rates were determined with time to reparable failure and complete failure as endpoints. Kaplan-Meier five-year survival rates were 86.6% (SE 0.27%) for reparable failure and 87.2% (SE 0.27%) for complete failure. Differences between survival rates of direct and indirect restorations [89.9% (SE 0.34%) vs. 83.2% (SE 0.42%) for reparable failure and 91.2% (SE 0.32%) vs. 83.2% (SE 0.42%) for complete failure] were not statistically significant (p = .23 for reparable failure; p = .15 for complete failure). Mode of failure was predominantly adhesive. The results suggest that direct and indirect techniques provide comparable results over the long term (trial registration number: ISRCTN29200848).

Keywords: clinical studies/trials; composite materials; operative dentistry; prosthetic dentistry/prosthodontics; restorative dentistry; restorative materials.

Figure 1.

CONSORT flow diagram detailing patient recruitment and follow-up at 5 yrs.

Figure 2.

Life cycle of adhesive restorations replacing cusps during the follow-up period.

Figure 3.

Restoration survival probability as a function of time for direct (n = 92) and indirect (n = 84) adhesive restorations replacing cusps.

Figure 4.

Failure categories (n) for the direct and indirect techniques.