Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct 14;8(10):e77347.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077347. eCollection 2013.

No evidence for heritability of male mating latency or copulation duration across social environments in Drosophila melanogaster

Affiliations

No evidence for heritability of male mating latency or copulation duration across social environments in Drosophila melanogaster

Michelle L Taylor et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

A key assumption underpinning major models of sexual selection is the expectation that male sexual attractiveness is heritable. Surprisingly, however, empirical tests of this assumption are relatively scarce. Here we use a paternal full-sib/half-sib breeding design to examine genetic and environmental variation in male mating latency (a proxy for sexual attractiveness) and copulation duration in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. As our experimental design also involved the manipulation of the social environment within each full-sibling family, we were able to further test for the presence of genotype-by-environment interactions (GEIs) in these traits, which have the potential to compromise mate choice for genetic benefits. Our experimental manipulation of the social environment revealed plastic expression of both traits; males exposed to a rival male during the sensitive period of adult sexual maturation exhibited shorter mating latencies and longer copulation durations than those who matured in isolation. However, we found no evidence for GEIs, and no significant additive genetic variation underlying these traits in either environment. These results undermine the notion that the evolution of female choice rests on covariance between female preference and male displays, an expectation that underpins indirect benefit models such as the good genes and sexy sons hypotheses. However, our results may also indicate depletion of genetic variance in these traits in the natural population studied, thus supporting the expectation that traits closely aligned with reproductive fitness can exhibit low levels of additive genetic variance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Males decrease their mating latency after being exposed to a rival male.
Mean ± SE of mating latency of males in two different social environments.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Males increase their copulation duration after being exposed to a rival male.
Mean ± SE of copulation duration of males in two different social environments.

References

    1. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. NJ: Princeton University Press.
    1. Andersson M, Simmons LW (2006) Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 21: 296-302. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.015. PubMed: 16769428. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kokko H, Brooks R, Jennions MD, Morley J (2003) The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proc R Soc Lond B 270: 653-664. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2235. PubMed: 12769467. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fisher RA (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    1. Kirkpatrick M (1982) Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36: 1-12. doi:10.2307/2407961. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources