Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct 24;6(1):153.
doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-153.

Glycerol carbonate as green solvent for pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse

Affiliations

Glycerol carbonate as green solvent for pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse

Zhanying Zhang et al. Biotechnol Biofuels. .

Abstract

Background: Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass is a prerequisite for effective saccharification to produce fermentable sugars. In this study, "green" solvent systems based on acidified mixtures of glycerol carbonate (GC) and glycerol were used to treat sugarcane bagasse and the roles of each solvent in deconstructing biomass were determined.

Results: Pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse at 90°C for only 30 min with acidified GC produced a solid residue having a glucan digestibility of 90% and a glucose yield of 80%, which were significantly higher than a glucan digestibility of 16% and a glucose yield of 15% obtained for bagasse pretreated with acidified ethylene carbonate (EC). Biomass compositional analyses showed that GC pretreatment removed more lignin than EC pretreatment (84% vs 54%). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that fluffy and size-reduced fibres were produced from GC pretreatment whereas EC pretreatment produced compact particles of reduced size. The maximal glucan digestibility and glucose yield of GC/glycerol systems were about 7% lower than those of EC/ethylene glycol (EG) systems. Replacing up to 50 wt% of GC with glycerol did not negatively affect glucan digestibility and glucose yield. The results from pretreatment of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) showed that (1) pretreatment with acidified alkylene glycol (AG) alone increased enzymatic digestibility compared to pretreatments with acidified alkylene carbonate (AC) alone and acidified mixtures of AC and AG, (2) pretreatment with acidified GC alone slightly increased, but with acidified EC alone significantly decreased, enzymatic digestibility compared to untreated MCC, and (3) there was a good positive linear correlation of enzymatic digestibility of treated and untreated MCC samples with congo red (CR) adsorption capacity.

Conclusions: Acidified GC alone was a more effective solvent for pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse than acidified EC alone. The higher glucose yield obtained with GC-pretreated bagasse is possibly due to the presence of one hydroxyl group in the GC molecular structure, resulting in more significant biomass delignification and defibrillation, though both solvent pretreatments reduced bagasse particles to a similar extent. The maximum glucan digestibility of GC/glycerol systems was less than that of EC/EG systems, which is likely attributed to glycerol being less effective than EG in biomass delignification and defibrillation. Acidified AC/AG solvent systems were more effective for pretreatment of lignin-containing biomass than MCC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Molecular structures and ϵ values of GC, EC and PC [13].
Figure 2
Figure 2
FTIR spectra of pretreated bagasse samples.
Figure 3
Figure 3
CR adsorption capacity of pretreated MCC.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Correlation of glucan digestibility of MCC samples with CR adsorption capacity.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hendriks A, Zeeman G. Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2009;6:10–18. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.05.027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee YY, Holtzapple M, Ladisch M. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2005;6:673–686. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhu JY, Pan XJ, Zalesny RS. Pretreatment of woody biomass for biofuel production: energy efficiency, technologies, and recalcitrance. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;6:847–857. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2654-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Camacho F, GonzalezTello P, Jurado E, Robles A. Microcrystalline-cellulose hydrolysis with concentrated sulphuric acid. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 1996;6:350–356. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199612)67:4<350::AID-JCTB564>3.0.CO;2-9. - DOI
    1. Iranmahboob J, Nadim F, Monemi S. Optimizing acid-hydrolysis: a critical step for production of ethanol from mixed wood chips. Biomass Bioenerg. 2002;6:401–404. doi: 10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00016-8. - DOI