Five-year clinical and functional multislice computed tomography angiographic results after coronary implantation of the fully resorbable polymeric everolimus-eluting scaffold in patients with de novo coronary artery disease: the ABSORB cohort A trial
- PMID: 24156961
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.017
Five-year clinical and functional multislice computed tomography angiographic results after coronary implantation of the fully resorbable polymeric everolimus-eluting scaffold in patients with de novo coronary artery disease: the ABSORB cohort A trial
Abstract
Objectives: This study sought to demonstrate the 5-year clinical and functional multislice computed tomography angiographic results after implantation of the fully resorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold (Absorb BVS, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California).
Background: Multimodality imaging of the first-in-humans trial using a ABSORB BVS scaffold demonstrated at 2 years the bioresorption of the device while preventing restenosis. However, the long-term safety and efficacy of this therapy remain to be documented.
Methods: In the ABSORB cohort A trial (ABSORB Clinical Investigation, Cohort A [ABSORB A] Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System Clinical Investigation), 30 patients with a single de novo coronary artery lesion were treated with the fully resorbable everolimus-eluting Absorb scaffold at 4 centers. As an optional investigation in 3 of the 4 centers, the patients underwent multislice computed tomography (MSCT) angiography at 18 months and 5 years. Acquired MSCT data were analyzed at an independent core laboratory (Cardialysis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands) for quantitative analysis of lumen dimensions and was further processed for calculation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) at another independent core laboratory (Heart Flow, Redwood City, California).
Results: Five-year clinical follow-up is available for 29 patients. One patient withdrew consent after 6 months, but the vital status of this patient remains available. At 46 days, 1 patient experienced a single episode of chest pain and underwent a target lesion revascularization with a slight troponin increase after the procedure. At 5 years, the ischemia-driven major adverse cardiac event rate of 3.4% remained unchanged. Clopidogrel was discontinued in all but 1 patient. Scaffold thrombosis was not observed in any patient. Two noncardiac deaths were reported, 1 caused by duodenal perforation and the other from Hodgkin's disease. At 5 years, 18 patients underwent MSCT angiography. All scaffolds were patent, with a median minimal lumen area of 3.25 mm(2) (interquartile range: 2.20 to 4.30). Noninvasive FFR analysis was feasible in 13 of 18 scans, which yielded a median distal FFR of 0.86 (interquartile range: 0.82 to 0.94).
Conclusions: The low event rate at 5 years suggests sustained safety after the implantation of a fully bioresorbable Absorb everolimus-eluting scaffold. Noninvasive assessment of the coronary artery with an option of functional assessment could be an alternative to invasive imaging after treatment of coronary narrowing with such a polymeric bioresorbable scaffold. (ABSORB Clinical Investigation, Cohort A [ABSORB A] Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System Clinical Investigation [ABSORB]; NCT00300131).
Keywords: CT; FFR; FFR(CT); ID; IQR; IVUS; MACE; MI; MSCT; OCT; PDLLA; PLLA; QCA; TLR; TVR; bioresorbable scaffold; computed tomography; everolimus; fractional flow reserve; interquartile range; intravascular ultrasound; ischemia-driven; major adverse cardiac event(s); multislice computed tomography; myocardial infarction; noninvasive fractional flow reserve according to multislice computed tomography; noninvasive functional assessment; optical coherence tomography; poly-d,l-lactide; poly-l-lactide; quantitative coronary angiography; target lesion revascularization; target vessel revascularization.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
The synergy between percutaneous therapies and noninvasive diagnostic imaging.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct;6(10):1010-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.09.003. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013. PMID: 24156962 No abstract available.
-
Challenges in multislice computed tomography based fractional flow reserve to evaluate interventional treatment.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Oct 1;84(4):684-5. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25346. Epub 2013 Dec 23. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014. PMID: 24323738 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Incidence and imaging outcomes of acute scaffold disruption and late structural discontinuity after implantation of the absorb Everolimus-Eluting fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold: optical coherence tomography assessment in the ABSORB cohort B Trial (A Clinical Evaluation of the Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Dec;7(12):1400-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.06.016. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014. PMID: 25523532 Clinical Trial.
-
A next-generation bioresorbable coronary scaffold system: from bench to first clinical evaluation: 6- and 12-month clinical and multimodality imaging results.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):89-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.007. Epub 2013 Oct 16. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014. PMID: 24139932 Clinical Trial.
-
A clinical and angiographic study of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: the EXECUTIVE trial (EXecutive RCT: evaluating XIENCE V in a multi vessel disease).JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct;6(10):1012-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.016. Epub 2013 Sep 18. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013. PMID: 24055444 Clinical Trial.
-
Edge vascular response after percutaneous coronary intervention: an intracoronary ultrasound and optical coherence tomography appraisal: from radioactive platforms to first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents and bioresorbable scaffolds.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Mar;6(3):211-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.01.132. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013. PMID: 23517830 Review.
-
Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for the treatment of coronary artery disease: what have we learned from randomized-controlled clinical trials?Coron Artery Dis. 2017 Jan;28(1):77-89. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000414. Coron Artery Dis. 2017. PMID: 27561169 Review.
Cited by
-
Appropriate use of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in percutaneous coronary interventions: a recommendation from experienced users : A position statement on the use of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in the Netherlands.Neth Heart J. 2015 Mar;23(3):161-5. doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0651-3. Neth Heart J. 2015. PMID: 25626696 Free PMC article.
-
Bioresorbable scaffold technology: The yet unfulfilled promise of becoming the workhorse stent in the cardiac catherization laboratory.Egypt Heart J. 2018 Dec;70(4):409-414. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Sep 14. Egypt Heart J. 2018. PMID: 30591764 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold.Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017 Feb;108(2):109-115. doi: 10.5935/abc.20160202. Epub 2017 Jan 9. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28076449 Free PMC article.
-
Methods to assess bioresorbable vascular scaffold devices behaviour after implantation.J Thorac Dis. 2017 Aug;9(Suppl 9):S959-S968. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.110. J Thorac Dis. 2017. PMID: 28894602 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How far have we come with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds, and where should we go?Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017 Jun;7(Suppl 2):S86-S90. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.01.11. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017. PMID: 28748155 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials