Physicians' radiation exposure in the catheterization lab: does the type of procedure matter?
- PMID: 24156970
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.012
Physicians' radiation exposure in the catheterization lab: does the type of procedure matter?
Abstract
Objectives: This study sought to evaluate differences in radiation exposure of the operator depending on the type of catheterization lab procedure.
Background: Invasive cardiologists and angiologists are exposed to long-term, low-dose occupational radiation. Increased workload and specialization require more detailed knowledge of the extent and cause of the radiation exposure.
Methods: In this prospective single-center experience, radiation doses of 3 operators were measured by real-time dosimetry for body, neck, and hand during 284 procedures in 281 patients over a period of 14 weeks. To determine the association between the type of procedure and the doses and to draw a pairwise comparison between the procedures, 3 mixed models were used.
Results: The type of procedure, the patient's body mass index, and the fluoroscopy time were independently associated with the operator's radiation exposure. Per procedure, the operators were exposed to a mean effective dose (E) of 2.2 ± 5.9 μSv. Compared with coronary angiography, E was 2.3-fold higher in pelvic procedures (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7 to 3.0, p < 0.001), 1.7-fold higher in upper limb procedures (95% CI: 1.3 to 2.1, p < 0.001), and 1.4-fold higher in below-the-knee procedures (95% CI: 1.1 to 2.0, p = 0.023). The mean eye dose was 19.1 ± 37.6 μSv. Eye doses were significantly higher in peripheral procedures than in coronary angiography procedures. The mean hand dose was 99.6 ± 196.0 μSv. Hand doses were significantly higher in pelvic than in coronary angiography, upper limb, and below-the-knee procedures.
Conclusions: Endovascular procedures for pelvic, upper limb, and below-the-knee disease are accompanied with a higher radiation exposure of the operator than with coronary procedures.
Keywords: BMI; BTK; CAG; CI; DAP; E; FISH; ICRP; International Commission on Radiological Protection; NCRP; National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; PCI; UL; below the knee; biological dosimetry; body mass index; confidence interval; coronary angiography; dose area product; dose aware system; estimated effective dose; fluorescence in situ hybridization; occupational radiation exposure; percutaneous coronary intervention; radiation exposure in cardiology and angiology; real-time dosimetry; upper limb.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Radiation exposure to operating room personnel and patients during endovascular procedures.J Vasc Surg. 2013 Sep;58(3):702-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.02.032. Epub 2013 Jun 28. J Vasc Surg. 2013. PMID: 23810300 Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness of low rate fluoroscopy at reducing operator and patient radiation dose during transradial coronary angiography and interventions.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 May;7(5):567-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Apr 16. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014. PMID: 24746649 Clinical Trial.
-
Occupational radiation doses to operators performing cardiac catheterization procedures.Health Phys. 2008 Mar;94(3):211-27. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000290614.76386.35. Health Phys. 2008. PMID: 18301095 Review.
-
Effect of a real-time radiation monitoring device on operator radiation exposure during cardiac catheterization: the radiation reduction during cardiac catheterization using real-time monitoring study.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Dec;7(6):744-50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001974. Epub 2014 Nov 25. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014. PMID: 25423958 Clinical Trial.
-
Recommendations for occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jul 1;82(1):29-42. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24694. Epub 2013 Mar 8. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013. PMID: 23475846 Review.
Cited by
-
Prostatic artery embolization performed in anteroposterior projections versus steep oblique projections: single centre retrospective comparative analysis.CVIR Endovasc. 2021 Feb 9;4(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s42155-021-00209-7. CVIR Endovasc. 2021. PMID: 33559762 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of dosimetric approaches in evaluating radiation exposure for interventional cardiologists in Sri Lanka.Radiol Phys Technol. 2024 Mar;17(1):258-268. doi: 10.1007/s12194-023-00774-7. Epub 2024 Jan 19. Radiol Phys Technol. 2024. PMID: 38240885
-
Physician and Patient Radiation Exposure During Endovascular Procedures.Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2017 Feb;19(2):10. doi: 10.1007/s11936-017-0507-9. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2017. PMID: 28275940 Review.
-
Real-World Reductions in Lead-Free Radiation Exposure with the Rampart System during Endovascular Procedures.Am J Cardiol. 2025 May 15;243:59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.02.019. Epub 2025 Feb 20. Am J Cardiol. 2025. PMID: 39986445
-
Digital variance angiography allows about 70% decrease of DSA-related radiation exposure in lower limb X-ray angiography.Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 8;11(1):21790. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01208-3. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34750427 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous