Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Feb;11(2):187-93.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.10.033. Epub 2013 Oct 22.

Relative efficacy of catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs in treating premature ventricular contractions: a single-center retrospective study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Relative efficacy of catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs in treating premature ventricular contractions: a single-center retrospective study

Li Zhong et al. Heart Rhythm. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

Background: It is unknown whether radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or antiarrhythmic therapy is superior when treating patients with symptomatic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs).

Objective: To determine the relative efficacy of RFA and antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) on PVC burden reduction and increasing left ventricular systolic function.

Methods: Patients with frequent PVCs (>1000/24 h) were treated either by RFA or with AADs from January 2005 through December 2010. Data from 24-hour Holter monitoring and echocardiography before and 6-12 months after treatment were compared between the 2 groups.

Results: Of 510 patients identified, 215 (40%) underwent RFA and 295 (60%) received AADs. The reduction in PVC frequency was greater by RFA than with AADs (-21,799/24 h vs -8,376/24 h; P < .001). The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was increased significantly after RFA (53%-56%; P < .001) but not after AAD (52%- 52%; P = .6) therapy. Of 121 (24%) patients with reduced LVEF, 39 (32%) had LVEF normalization to 50% or greater. LVEF was restored in 25 of 53 (47%) patients in the RFA group compared with 14 of 68 (21%) patients in the AAD group (P = .003). PVC coupling interval less than 450 ms, less impaired left ventricular function, and RFA were independent predictors of LVEF normalization performed by using multivariate analysis.

Conclusion: RFA appears to be more effective than AADs in PVC reduction and LVEF normalization.

Keywords: AAD; Antiarrhythmic drug; CAD; CCB; DCM; ECG; ICM; LV; LVEDD; LVEF; LVESD; LVOT; Left ventricular dysfunction; NSVT; PVC; PVC-CMP; Premature ventricular contraction; Premature ventricular contraction–induced cardiomyopathy; RFA; RV; RVOT; Radiofrequency catheter ablation; antiarrhythmic drug; calcium channel blocker; coronary artery disease; dilated cardiomyopathy; electrocardiogram; ischemic cardiomyopathy; left ventricular ejection fraction; left ventricular end-diastolic dimension; left ventricular end-systolic dimension; left ventricular outflow tract; left ventricular/ventricle; nonsustained ventricular tachycardia; premature ventricular contraction; premature ventricular contraction–induced cardiomyopathy; radiofrequency ablation; right ventricular outflow tract; right ventricular/ventricle.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources