Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Dec;8(12):2165-73.
doi: 10.2215/CJN.03350313. Epub 2013 Oct 24.

The cost-effectiveness of using payment to increase living donor kidneys for transplantation

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The cost-effectiveness of using payment to increase living donor kidneys for transplantation

Lianne Barnieh et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Background and objectives: For eligible candidates, transplantation is considered the optimal treatment compared with dialysis for patients with ESRD. The growing number of patients with ESRD requires new strategies to increase the pool of potential donors.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: Using decision analysis modeling, this study compared a strategy of paying living kidney donors to waitlisted recipients on dialysis with the current organ donation system. In the base case estimate, this study assumed that the number of donors would increase by 5% with a payment of $10,000. Quality of life estimates, resource use, and costs (2010 Canadian dollars) were based on the best available published data.

Results: Compared with the current organ donation system, a strategy of increasing the number of kidneys for transplantation by 5% by paying living donors $10,000 has an incremental cost-savings of $340 and a gain of 0.11 quality-adjusted life years. Increasing the number of kidneys for transplantation by 10% and 20% would translate into incremental cost-savings of $1640 and $4030 and incremental quality-adjusted life years gain of 0.21 and 0.39, respectively.

Conclusion: Although the impact is uncertain, this model suggests that a strategy of paying living donors to increase the number of kidneys available for transplantation could be cost-effective, even with a transplant rate increase of only 5%. Future work needs to examine the feasibility, legal policy, ethics, and public perception of a strategy to pay living donors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Overview of model. QALY, quality-adjusted life year.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Two-way sensitivity analysis: cost per QALY gained for varying payments to living donor ($10,000–$50,000) and varying increases in transplantation.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Tornado diagram representing the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of one-way sensitivity analyses under base case conditions.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Incremental cost-effectiveness scatter plot of a strategy of paying living donors compared with the current organ donation system.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Laupacis A, Keown P, Pus N, Krueger H, Ferguson B, Wong C, Muirhead N: A study of the quality of life and cost-utility of renal transplantation. Kidney Int 50: 235–242, 1996 - PubMed
    1. Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, Ojo AO, Ettenger RE, Agodoa LY, Held PJ, Port FK: Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med 341: 1725–1730, 1999 - PubMed
    1. Perico N, Remuzzi G: Chronic kidney disease: A research and public health priority. Nephrol Dial Transplant 27[Suppl 3]: iii19–iii26, 2012 - PubMed
    1. Canadian Institute for Health Information : Canadian Organ Replacement Register Annual Report: Treatment of End-Stage Organ Failure in Canada, 2001 to 2010, Ottawa, ON, Canada, CIHI, 2011
    1. US Renal Data System : USRDS 2012 Annual Data Report: Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States, Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2012

Publication types

MeSH terms