Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Nov;1(3-4):159-67.
doi: 10.1159/000343829.

Portal vein embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

Affiliations
Review

Portal vein embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

Junichi Shindoh et al. Liver Cancer. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

Portal vein embolization (PVE) improves the safety of major hepatectomy through hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR), atrophy of the liver volume to be resected, and improvement in patient selection. Because most patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have liver parenchymal injury due to underlying viral hepatitis or alcoholic liver fibrosis/cirrhosis, indication of PVE is relatively complex and sequential procedures, including transarterial chemoembolization, are required to maximize the effect of PVE as well as to minimize tumor progression due to increased arterial flow after PVE. PVE is currently indicated for patients with relatively well-preserved hepatic function [Child-Pugh A and indocyanine green tolerance test (ICG-R15) <20%) to achieve minimal FLR volume for safe major hepatectomy. FLR volume >40% is the minimal requirement for patients with chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis, and further strict criteria (FLR volume >50%) have been recommended for patients with marginal liver functional reserve (ICG-R15, 10-20%). Recent clinical results have suggested that PVE can be safely performed in patients with HCC and that it contributes to improved survival after major hepatectomy.

Keywords: Hepatocellular Carcinoma; Portal Vein Embolization; Transarterial Chemoembolization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Volume changes in FLR and embolized liver postPVE.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Indications of PVE for patients with HCC.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Makuuchi M. Preoperative transcatheter embolization of the portal venous branch for patients receiving extended lobectomy dur to the bile duct carcinoma. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 1982;45:1558–1564.
    1. Makuuchi M, Thai BL, Takayasu K, Takayama T, Kosuge T, Gunven P, Yamazaki S, Hasegawa H, Ozaki H. Preoperative portal embolization to increase safety of major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma: a preliminary report. Surgery. 1990;107:521–527. - PubMed
    1. Kim RD, Kim JS, Watanabe G, Mohuczy D, Behrns KE. Liver regeneration and the atrophy-hypertrophy complex. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2008;25:92–103. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jungermann K, Kietzmann T. Oxygen: modulator of metabolic zonation and disease of the liver. Hepatology. 2000;31:255–260. - PubMed
    1. Lemasters JJ, Ji S, Thurman RG. Centrilobular injury following hypoxia in isolated, perfused rat liver. Science. 1981;213:661–663. - PubMed