Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov;15(11):1351-61.
doi: 10.1038/ncb2861. Epub 2013 Oct 27.

TGF-β2 dictates disseminated tumour cell fate in target organs through TGF-β-RIII and p38α/β signalling

Affiliations

TGF-β2 dictates disseminated tumour cell fate in target organs through TGF-β-RIII and p38α/β signalling

Paloma Bragado et al. Nat Cell Biol. 2013 Nov.

Abstract

In patients, non-proliferative disseminated tumour cells (DTCs) can persist in the bone marrow (BM) while other organs (such as lung) present growing metastasis. This suggested that the BM might be a metastasis 'restrictive soil' by encoding dormancy-inducing cues in DTCs. Here we show in a head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) model that strong and specific transforming growth factor-β2 (TGF-β2) signalling in the BM activates the MAPK p38α/β, inducing an (ERK/p38)(low) signalling ratio. This results in induction of DEC2/SHARP1 and p27, downregulation of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) and dormancy of malignant DTCs. TGF-β2-induced dormancy required TGF-β receptor-I (TGF-β-RI), TGF-β-RIII and SMAD1/5 activation to induce p27. In lungs, a metastasis 'permissive soil' with low TGF-β2 levels, DTC dormancy was short-lived and followed by metastatic growth. Importantly, systemic inhibition of TGF-β-RI or p38α/β activities awakened dormant DTCs, fuelling multi-organ metastasis. Our work reveals a 'seed and soil' mechanism where TGF-β2 and TGF-β-RIII signalling through p38α/β regulates DTC dormancy and defines restrictive (BM) and permissive (lung) microenvironments for HNSCC metastasis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Growth behaviour of BM- and lung-derived DTCs
(a) Phase contrast and GFP channel images of a single DTC in a BM flush (upper left panel) and a lung metastasis (upper right panel) 3 wks after primary tumour surgery. Scale bar: 40 µm (BM), 400 µm (lung). S= stroma. Lower left panel: fluorescence images of lungs stroma and a micro-metastasis in a freshly resected lung. Lower right panel: laser scanning confocal image of a DTC cluster in lung. Scale bar: 160 µm (left), 20 µm (right). n=16 (BM), 35 (LU) mice. (b) Number of HEp3-GFP DTCs found in lungs and BM after primary tumour surgery (n=5 mice / time / condition). (c) Tumour volume of primary tumour- (PT-HEp3), lung- (Lu-HEp3) and BM-DTC-derived cell lines (BM-HEp3) from mice, after 1 week on CAM. BM-T1= tumorigenic in vivo, BM-D1=dormantin vivo. (n=5 (Lu6), 5 (Lu7), 4 (PT-2), 7 (PT-4), 5 (BM-T1), 5 (BM-D1) tumours). (d) Phospho-Histone3 (P-H3) (left column) and p27 (right column) staining in BM-D1 (upper panels) tumour nodules and Lu-7 (lower panels) tumours grown on CAMs. Scale bar: 40 µm. Arrows = positive cells. Lower panel: quantification of P-H3 and p27 positive cells (n=100 cells assessed/section. 15 sections assessed from 3 different tumour/ condition). FOV = field of view. (e) Weight of BM-D1 tumour nodules on CAMs. BM-D1 cells were inoculated on CAM (5×105 cells/animal) and transplanted into a new CAM every week (n=3 (week1), 5 (week2), 5 (week 3), 5 (week 4), 3 (week 5), 4 (week 6), 2 (week 7), 3 (week 8) tumours/ time point). (f) Number of tumour cells / CAM nodule produced by primary tumour- (PT-HEp3) and BM-DTC cell lines (BM-HEp3) derived from avian after 1 week on CAM (n=4 (BM-D2), 3 (BM-D3), 4 (BM-D4), 10 (PT), 5 (BM-D5), 5 (BM-T2), 4 (BM-T3), 2 (BM-D6), 3 (BM-D7), 3 (BM-D8) tumours). See supplementary table S4 for statistic source data. Data in a, b and d, represent mean ± s.e.m. In b and d, *p<0.05, **p<0.01 and +++p<0.001 by Mann Whitney test. In c and f *p<0.05, **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001 by One-way ANOVA-Bonferroni's multiple comparison test and in e **p<0.01 by Unpaired t test.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Signalling pathways and genes regulating dormancy of BM-HEp3 Cells
(a–b) Lysates from the indicated DTC-derived cell lines from murine (a) and avian microenvironments (b) were probed by immunoblot (IB) for the indicated antigens. Numbers on top of blots = [ERK/p38] ratio quantification (see Methods). (c) Graph showing percentage of cell lines with high or low ERK/p38 ratio and their phenotypein vivo. (d) Left panel: Heat map showing DEC2 and p53 mRNA expression in the indicated cell lines after 24h in culture. Scale = log2 fold change and upregulation of mRNAs (red) was significant (p<0.05). Middle and right panels: IB for p53 and GAPDH in the indicated cell lines after 24h in culture. (e) BM-D1 cells transfected with either scrambled (scr), p53, p38α or DEC2 siRNAs or Lu-HEp3 cells transfected with empty vector (Ctrl) or a constitutively active p38α construct (p38α-CA-HA) or a DEC2-V5 construct were inoculated in vivo (5×105 BM-D1 cells / CAM and 2.5×105 lu-7 cells / CAM) for 5 days. The graph represents the number of cells per tumour nodule (n=18 (scr), 12 (p53), 6 (p38), 7 (dec2), 20 (Ctrl), 7 (p38CA-HA), 5 (DEC2-V5) tumours per condition). *p<0.05 and **p<0.01 by one-way ANOVA-Bonferroni's multiple comparison test. (f) Growth of BM-D1 cells on CAM after RNAi to DEC2 for two weeks in vivo. BM-D1 cells transfected with scrambled (scr) or DEC2 siRNA were inoculate in CAMs (5×105 BM-D1 cells / CAM). One week after the tumour nodules were mince, cells/tumour nodule were quantified, transfected again with either scrambled or DEC2 siRNAs and reinoculated again in vivo. Graph= mean number of cells / tumour nodule ± s.e.m. (n=4-Si scr week1, 5 Si DEC2 week1, 3-Si scr week2, 5 Si DEC2 week2 tumours per condition). See supplementary table S4 for statistic source data. *p<0.05 and **p<0.01 by Mann Whitney Test. Right panel: p27 and CDK4 expression in BM-D1 cell lines after DEC2 inhibition with siRNAs. Scr=scrambled. (g) p27, p21 and CDK4 immunoblot in T-HEp3 cells transfected with either a GFP or a DEC2-V5 construct for 24h.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Systemic p38α/β inhibition affects HNSCC DTC behaviour in growth restrictive microenvironments
(a) Representative images of Cytokeratin 8/18 (CK), P-H3 (left) and p27 (right) staining in solitary BM DTCs in BM cytospins. Scale bar: 10 µm. Right Graph: percentage of p27 and P-H3 positive DTCs / BM flush, Numbers on top = n for scored DTCs. 6 BM flushes/ 3 independent experiments were assessed (b) Quantification of BM-DTCs in mice treated with DMSO (control) or SB203580 (SB) (10 mg/kg every 48 hrs) for 4 weeks. Left Graph: Alu qPCR quantification of BM DTCs shows the human Alu genomic signal normalized to genomic mouse GAPDH (n=6 (control), 15 (SB) DNA samples were assessed over 3 independent experiments) (see methods for details). Right Graph: quantification of CK positive cells in mice BM cytospins (n=6 BM samples / condition were assessed over 2 independent experiments). *p<0.05 by wilcoxon signed rank test. (c–d) Live imaging of HEp3-GFP DTCs, micro and macrometastasis in spleen (c) and liver (d) of control (scale bar: 80µm) and SB203580 treated mice (Spleen, scale bar: 400µm and liver, scale bar: 80µm). Numbers= GFP positive cells per organ. (e) Quantification of BM-DTCs in chicken embryos’ BM flushes 5 days after inoculation of T-HEp3-GFP cells transfected with either scrambled (si scr) or p38α (si p38α) siRNAs. (n=7 (si Scr), 6 (sip38) BM samples were assessed over 2 independent experiments). Lower panels: representative fluorescence intravital images of BM DTCs in chicken embryo BM flushes. Scale bar: 160µm. (f) Graph: percentage of p27 positive cells / BM flush (n=3 BM flushes were assessed over 2 independent experiments). Lower Panels: representative images of CK (right column) and p27 (left column) staining in solitary BM DTCs in chicken embryos BMs 5 days after inoculation of T-HEp3-GFP cells transfected with scrambled (scr) (upper row) or p38α (lower row) siRNA. Scale bar=40µM. Data in a, b and f, represent mean ± s.e.m. In b (left graph), e and f, *p<0.05, **p<0.01 by Mann Whitney test.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Systemic p38α/β inhibition interrupts DTC dormancy in the lungs
(a–b) Representative images of P-H3 and Vimentin (a) or Caspase 3 (C–C3) and Vimentin (b) staining in lung DTCs (upper panels, scale bar: 20 µm) and lung micro-metastases (micro-MET – a only) 4 weeks after surgery (scale bar: 40 µm (Micro-MET (a), inset (b)). Arrows: marker positive cells. Graphs: % of P-H3 (a) or C-C3 (b) positive cells per lung section, mean ± s.e.m. of three different lungs, 5 sections per lung (n=45 (DTCs), n=416 (Met) DTCs per lungs section (a), n=36 (DTCs) (b)). *p<0.05 (a) and non significant (n.s.) (b) by Mann Whitney Test. (c) Representative lung images containing HEp3-GFP DTCs or metastasis (scale bars: 80 µm, left column and 400 µm right column) after surgery and control or SB203580 (SB) (10 mg/kg every 48 hrs) treatment for 2 and 4 weeks. Lower Graphs: quantification of HEp3-GFP cells in whole lung suspensions. (n=5 (Left graph) and 4 (right graph) lungs per condition). See Supplementary table S4 for the statistic source data of the right graph. *p<0.05 by Mann Whitney Test. (d) Number of lung F3II breast cancer macro-metastasis / lung in mice treated with DMSO (control) or SB203580 (SB). Top numbers: prevalence (%) of mice with more than 3 metastatic nodules per lung. n=25 mice, *p=0.046 by Mann Whitney Test.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Role of TGFβ2 in dormant HEp3 DTCs
(a–b) Q-PCR analysis of TGFβ2 mRNA levels in the indicated cells cultured in serum-free media for 24h (a) in BM and lungs mice organs (b) (n=6 RNA samples per condition were assessed over 3 independent experiments). (c) Q-PCR for TGFβ2 mRNA in T-HEp3 cells treated with serum-free media (SF) or conditioned media (CM) from lung (Lu CM) or BM (BM CM) (24h). (n=6 RNA samples were assessed over 3 independent experiments). (d) Growth after 5 days of T-HEp3 cells on CAMs (2*105cell/CAM) pre-treated in culture for 24h and then on the CAM every day with SF, BM CM or Lu CM (n=11 (SF), 3 (lu CM), 8 (BM CM) tumour nodules per condition). (e) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for P-H3 (upper row) and p27 (lower row) in T-HEp3 tumour nodule sections after treatment with SF (left column), Lu CM (middle column) or BM CM (right column) for 5 days in vivo, scale bar: 40 µm. Arrows: marker-positive cells. Lower graphs: Quantification of P-H3 (left) and p27 (right) positive cells (n=100 cells assessed/section. 15 sections assessed from 3 different tumour/ condition). (f) Detection of the indicated antigens in lysates of T-HEp3 cells treated with, SF, Lu CM or BM CM control (IP-IgG) or TGFβ2 immunodepleted (IP- TGFβ2) for 24h. Top numbers: [ERK/p38] ratio quantification. (g) Q-PCR for p53 and DEC2 mRNA in T-HEp3 cells treated as in c (n=6 RNA samples were assessed over 3 independent experiments). (h) Top panel: IB against TGFβ2 in the BM CM after IgG or anti-TGFβ2 immunodepletion. Lower panel: Tumour growth of T-HEp3 cells treated with full or TGFβ2-immunodepleted BM CM or with Lu CM supplemented with PBS (CM) or with 2 ng/ml TGFβ2 (n=22 (SF), 15 (IP-IgG), 8 (IP-TGFb2), 7 (lu CM), 5 (Lu-Cm TGFB2) tumours per condition). (i) Effect of TGFβ1 (2 ng/ml) on T-HEp3 and dormant D-HEp3 and BM-D1 tumour growth on CAMs for 5 days in vivo (n=6 (DHEp3-TGFb1), 9 (DHEp3+TGFb1), 10 (BM-D1-TGFb1), 10 (BM-D1+TGFb1), 13 (THEp3-TGFb1), 11 tumours per condition). Data in a, b, c, e and g, represent mean ± s.e.m. In a, b, c, e and g, *p<0.05, **p<0.01 by Mann Whitney test. In d, h and i *p<0.05, **p<0.01 by One-way ANOVA-Bonferroni's multiple comparison test.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Effect of TGFβ signalling on dormancy and self-renewal markers
(a) IB for the indicated antigens on PT-HEp3 (PT), BM-D1 and BM-T1 cell lysates after TGFβ2 (2 ng/ml) or TGFβRI inhibitor (LY-364947, 5 µM) treatment for 24 h in SF media. (b) IB for the indicated antigens on T-HEp3 cell lysates after treatment with TGFβ2 (2 ng/ml) for 24 h in SF media. (c–d) QPCR measured DEC2 (c) and p53 (d) mRNA levels in the indicated cells after treatment with 2 ng/ml TGFβ2 or LY-364947, 5 µM for 24 h in SF media (n=6 RNA samples were assessed over 3 independent experiments). (e) BM-D1 growth on CAMs for 4 days after TGFβ2 knockdown. BM-D1 cells were transfected with either scrambled (scr) or TGFβ2 siRNA and inoculated onto CAMs (5*105 cells/CAM) for 4 days (n=20 (scr), 19 (TGFβ2) tumours per condition). (f) BM-D1 growth on CAMs for 4 days after TGFβRI inhibition with LY364947 (5µM). BM-D1 cells were pre-treated with TGFβRI inhibitor (LY-364947, 5 µM) for 24 h in SF media and then inoculated onto CAMs (5*105 cells/CAM) for 5 days. Tumour nodules were treated with LY-364947 (5 µM) ever day in the CAMs (n=9 tumours per condition). Data in c and d represent mean ± s.e.m. In c, d, e and f *p<0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p<0.001 by Mann Whitney Test.
Figure 7
Figure 7. TGFβ2/TGFβ receptor III signalling regulates DTC dormancy
(a–b) IB for the indicated antigens on T-HEp3 cell lysates after treatment with either TGFβ1 or TGFβ2 (5 ng/ml) for 10, 30 min and 2 h (a) and 24 h (b) in SF media. (c–d) QPCR for DEC2 (c) and p27 (d) mRNA levels in T-HEp3 cells treated with either TGFβ1 or TGFβ2 (5 ng/ml) for 6 (d) and 24 h in SF media (n=6 RNA samples were assessed over 3 independent experiments) *p<0.05 by Mann Whitney Test. Error bars denote s.e.m. (e) IB for the indicated antigens on cell lysates of T-HEp3 treated with 5 ng/ml TGFβ2 for 24h in SF media with or without SB203580 (SB) (5 µM) (f) T-HEp3 tumour growth on CAMs for 4 days of T-HEp3 cells with TGFβR-III knockdown (siRNA TGFRβ3) treated with 5 ng/ml TGFβ2 (n=16 (scr, SF), 11 (scr, TGFb2), 15 (TGFbR3, SF), 17 (TGFbR3, TGFb2)), *p<0.05 by One-way ANOVA-Bonferroni's multiple comparison test. (g) IB for the indicated antigens on cell lysates of T-HEp3 treated with TGFβ2 (5 ng/ml) for 24 h in SF media and after TGFβR-III knockdown (siRNA TGFRβ3). (h)Tumour growth on CAMs for 4 days after treatment with TGFβ1 (2 ng/ml) in T-HEp3 cells after type III TGFβ receptor knockdown (siTGFβR3) (n=6 (scr, SF), n=7 (scr, TGFb1), n=6 (SiTGFBR3, SF), n=6 (SiTGFBR3, TGFb1)), p=0.3246 by One-way ANOVA-Bonferroni's multiple comparison test.
Figure 8
Figure 8. Effect of TGFβRI inhibition on DTC burden
(a) Prevalence of HEp3 DTCs (%) per mouse in control (n=20) and LY364947-treated (n=32) animals (2 independent experiments) (b) Alu qPCR quantification of HEp3 DTCs in BM of mice treated either with DMSO or with LY364947 10 mg/kg every 48 h for 2 weeks. Graph: mean ± s.e.m. of Alu amplification signal normalized to mice GAPDH (n=6 DNA samples from 6 different BM samples were assessed over 2 independent experiments), *p<0.05 by Mann Whitney Test. (c) Fluorescence images of HEp3-GFP DTCs in mouse lungs, 2 weeks after control (scale bar: 80 µm) and LY364947 treatment (scale bar: 120 µm). Lower graph: quantification of HEp3-GFP DTCs in lungs of control and LY364947 treated animals. n=4 mice per condition, *p<0.05 by Mann Whitney Test. (d) Scheme of the proposed mechanism for TGFβ2-induced dormancy. Binding of TGFβ2 to TGFβ receptor III (TGFβRIII) recruits TGFβ receptor II (TGFβRII) and TGFβ receptor I (TGFβRI) into the complex and activates TGFβ2 signalling which in turn activates Smad1/5 and induces p27. In addition, TGFβ2 also activates p38α in a TGFβRIII independent way. In response to TGFβ2, p38α activates SMAD2 and DEC2, which induces p27 and inhibits CDK4. All these signals integrate and contribute to TGFβ2 induction of quiescence.

References

    1. Fidler IJ. The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the 'seed and soil' hypothesis revisited. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:453–458. - PubMed
    1. Aguirre-Ghiso JA. Models, mechanisms and clinical evidence for cancer dormancy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:834–846. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Klein CA. Framework models of tumor dormancy from patient-derived observations. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2011;21:42–49. - PubMed
    1. Ferlito A, Shaha AR, Silver CE, Rinaldo A, Mondin V. Incidence and sites of distant metastases from head and neck cancer. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2001;63:202–207. - PubMed
    1. Zhang Y, Ma B, Fan Q. Mechanisms of breast cancer bone metastasis. Cancer Letters. 2010;292:1–7. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances