Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct 25;3(10):e003877.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003877.

A prospective cohort study to refine and validate the Panic Screening Score for identifying panic attacks associated with unexplained chest pain in the emergency department

Guillaume Foldes-Busque  1 , Isabelle Denis, Julien Poitras, Richard P Fleet, Patrick Archambault, Clermont E Dionne
Affiliations

A prospective cohort study to refine and validate the Panic Screening Score for identifying panic attacks associated with unexplained chest pain in the emergency department

Guillaume Foldes-Busque et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Panic-like anxiety (panic attacks with or without panic disorder), a highly treatable condition, is the most prevalent condition associated with unexplained chest pain in the emergency department. Panic-like anxiety may be responsible for a significant portion of the negative consequences of unexplained chest pain, such as functional limitations and chronicity. However, more than 92% of panic-like anxiety cases remain undiagnosed at the time of discharge from the emergency department. The 4-item Panic Screening Score (PSS) questionnaire was derived in order to increase the identification of panic-like anxiety in emergency department patients with unexplained chest pain.

Methods and analysis: The goals of this prospective cohort study were to (1) refine the PSS; (2) validate the revised version of the PSS; (3) measure the reliability of the revised version of the PSS and (4) assess the acceptability of the instrument among emergency physicians. Eligible and consenting patients will be administered the PSS in a large emergency department. Patients will be contacted by phone for administration of the criterion standard for panic attacks as well as by a standardised interview to collect information for other predictors of panic attacks. Multivariate analysis will be used to refine the PSS. The new version will be prospectively validated in an independent sample and inter-rater agreement will be assessed in 10% of cases. The screening instrument acceptability will be assessed with the Ottawa Acceptability of Decision Rules Instrument.

Ethics and dissemination: This study protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Alphonse-Desjardins research ethics committee. The results of the study will be presented in scientific conferences and published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. Further dissemination via workshops and a dedicated website is planned.

Keywords: Emergency medicine; Non-cardiac chest pain; Panic attacks; Panic disorder; Unexplained chest pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Panic Screening Score (PSS) questionnaire.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. McCaig LF, Burt CW. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2002 Emergency Department Summary. Adv Data 2004;340:1–34 - PubMed
    1. Christenson J, Innes G, Mcknight D, et al. Safety and efficiency of emergency department assessment of chest discomfort. CMAJ 2004;170:1803–7 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Foldes-Busque G, Marchand A, Chauny JM, et al. Unexplained chest pain in the ED: could it be panic? Am J Emerg Med 2011;29:743–51 - PubMed
    1. Karlson BW, Herlitz J, Pettersin P. Patients admitted to the emergency room with symptoms indicative of acute myocardial infarction. J Intern Med 1991;230:251–8 - PubMed
    1. Kontos MC, Jesse RL. Evaluation of the emergency department chest pain patient. Am J Cardiol 2000;85:32B–9B - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources