Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013:2013:630481.
doi: 10.1155/2013/630481. Epub 2013 Sep 15.

Is Hyperopia an Important Risk Factor for PACG in the Dutch Population?-A Case Control Study

Affiliations

Is Hyperopia an Important Risk Factor for PACG in the Dutch Population?-A Case Control Study

Saskia H M van Romunde et al. J Ophthalmol. 2013.

Abstract

Objectives. To determine if hyperopia is a risk factor for primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) in the Dutch population and to identify other biometrical parameters as risk factors for PACG including axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and k values. Methods. The study population consisted of PACG patients that had undergone a laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI). The control group consisted of age- and gender-matched cataract patients. The main outcome was hyperopia (spherical equivalent ≥+0.5 dioptres) measured with IOL Master or autorefractor. Refractive error, ACD, AL, and k values were tested with a Mann-Whitney U test and by logistic regression. Results. 117 PACG patients and 234 controls were included (mean age = 80 years ± 3.6). The prevalence of hyperopia in patients and controls was 69.6% and 61.1%, respectively (Fisher's test P = 0.076). Mann-Whitney U test showed no statistically significant relation with refractive error (P = 0.068) or k values (P = 0.607). In contrast, ACD and AL were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Tested with logistic regression, only ACD was a significant predictor of PACG (P < 0.001). Conclusion. There was no statistically significant correlation between refractive error and PACG. ACD was strongly correlated, though, with PACG, whereas AL turned out to be a less significant risk factor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart for selecting PACG patients and controls. REH = Rotterdam Eye Hospital.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of spherical equivalent (in dioptres) among patients (y = 100) and controls eyes (y = 0). The curve represents the risk prediction of PACG based on spherical equivalent refractive error.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Quigley H, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2006;90(3):262–267. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonomi L, Marchini G, Marraffa M, et al. Epidemiology of angle-closure glaucoma: prevalence, clinical types, and association with peripheral anterior chamber depth in Egna-Neumarkt glaucoma study. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(5):998–1003. - PubMed
    1. Nolan WP, Foster PJ, Devereux JG, Uranchimeg D, Johnson GJ, Baasanhu J. YAG laser iridotomy treatment for primary angle closure in east Asian eyes. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2000;84(11):1255–1259. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Casson RJ, Baker M, Edussuriya K, Senaratne T, Selva D, Sennanayake S. Prevalence and determinants of angle closure in central Sri Lanka: the Kandy Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(8):1444–1449. - PubMed
    1. Barkana Y, Dekel I, Goldich Y, Morad Y, Avni I, Zadok D. Angle closure in caucasians-a pilot, general ophthalmology clinic-based study. Journal of Glaucoma. 2012;21:337–341. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources