A retrospective population-based comparison of HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast carcinomas: impact of 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists criteria
- PMID: 24164555
- DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0617-OA
A retrospective population-based comparison of HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast carcinomas: impact of 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists criteria
Abstract
Context: In 2007 the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists made new recommendations for HER2 testing and redefined HER2 positivity.
Objective: To analyze results from simultaneous HER2 testing with immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in 2590 invasive breast carcinomas between 2002 and 2010, using 2 scoring systems.
Design: Cases from between 2002 and 2006 were scored by using original US Food and Drug Administration criteria (N = 1138) and those from between 2007 and 2010 were evaluated according to American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists criteria (N = 1452). Concordance between testing methods and clinicopathologic associations were determined.
Results: Overall concordance between immunohistochemistry/FISH in the 9-year period was 96.2% (κ = 0.82), and positive concordance was lower. After 2007, the proportion of HER2/neu-positive and HER2/neu-negative cases was not significantly changed when using immunohistochemistry (10.5% versus 8.9%, P = .22 and 69.4% versus 63%, P = .13, respectively), but the number of equivocal cases was higher (19.9% versus 28%, P < .001). While the proportion of negative cases by FISH remained unchanged after 2007 (86.5% versus 88.2%, P = .76), the number of positive cases was lower (13.4% versus 9.2%, P < .001). In addition, 38 cases (2.6%) were FISH equivocal, 16 of which were also equivocal by immunohistochemistry. Overall, immunohistochemistry/FISH concordance was 95.9% between 2002 and 2006 (κ = 0.82) and 96.4% after 2007 (κ = 0.82). However, an approximately 13% lower positive assay concordance was noted in the last period.
Conclusions: Application of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists recommendations is associated with comparable overall immunohistochemistry/FISH concordance, reduced positive concordance, and increased equivocal results.
Similar articles
-
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in gastroesophageal cancer: correlation between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011 Nov;135(11):1460-5. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2010-0541-OA. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011. PMID: 22032573
-
Impact of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations on HER2 interpretation in breast cancer.Hum Pathol. 2010 Jan;41(1):103-6. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.07.001. Epub 2009 Sep 16. Hum Pathol. 2010. PMID: 19762065
-
Implications of the Updated 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Gene Testing Using Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Breast Cancer.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016 Feb;140(2):140-7. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2015-0108-OA. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016. PMID: 26910218
-
Clinical and health economic outcomes of alternative HER2 test strategies for guiding adjuvant trastuzumab therapy.Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011 Jun;11(3):325-41. doi: 10.1586/erp.11.25. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011. PMID: 21671702 Review.
-
American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists 2018 Focused Update of Breast Cancer HER2 FISH Testing GuidelinesResults From a National Reference Laboratory.Am J Clin Pathol. 2019 Sep 9;152(4):479-485. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqz061. Am J Clin Pathol. 2019. PMID: 31172196 Review.
Cited by
-
Prognostic Impact of HER2-Low and HER2-Zero in Resectable Breast Cancer with Different Hormone Receptor Status: A Landmark Analysis of Real-World Data from the National Cancer Center of China.Target Oncol. 2024 Jan;19(1):81-93. doi: 10.1007/s11523-023-01030-z. Epub 2024 Jan 24. Target Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38265547
-
The Exciting New Field of HER2-Low Breast Cancer Treatment.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 1;13(5):1015. doi: 10.3390/cancers13051015. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33804398 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evolution and clinical significance of HER2-low status after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.Front Oncol. 2023 Feb 22;13:1086480. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1086480. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36910643 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics, efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy, and prognosis in HER2-low and HER2-ultralow breast cancer.Diagn Pathol. 2024 Sep 30;19(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s13000-024-01557-3. Diagn Pathol. 2024. PMID: 39350260 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of HER2 testing patterns, HER2+ disease, and the utilization of HER2-directed therapy in early breast cancer.Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2014 Oct 29;6:169-77. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S69416. eCollection 2014. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2014. PMID: 25378949 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous