Anteroposterior condylar position: a comparative study between subjects with normal occlusion and patients with Class I, Class II Division 1, and Class III malocclusions
- PMID: 24165809
- PMCID: PMC3816751
- DOI: 10.12659/MSM.889528
Anteroposterior condylar position: a comparative study between subjects with normal occlusion and patients with Class I, Class II Division 1, and Class III malocclusions
Abstract
Background: The present study aimed to determine and compare the anteroposterior position of the condyle in the mandibular fossa between groups of asymptomatic subjects with normal occlusion and asymptomatic subjects with Class I, Class II Division 1, and Class III malocclusions.
Material and methods: Thirty persons with normal occlusion, 30 with Class I malocclusion, 30 with Class II Division 1, and 30 with Class III had computed tomography scans of their temporomandibular joints. The anterior joint space/posterior joint space (AJS/PJS) ratio was determined for the right and left joints. The paired t test was used to analyze the AJS/PJS ratio between both sides for each group. The ANOVA test was applied to verify the differences between the groups for the measurements of the right and left sides. In case the ANOVA test confirmed significance, the Dunnett's t test was performed to compare the groups of malocclusion with that of normal occlusion.
Results: The paired t test between the AJS/PJS relationships in the right and left sides showed the following p values: Class I (0.168), Class II Division 1 (0.662), Class III (0.991), and normal occlusion (0.390). The ANOVA test showed a p value of 0.445 for the comparisons of the right side and 0.040 for the left side. The Dunnett's t test demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the Class II group and the normal occlusion group (p value of 0.026) in the joints of the left side.
Conclusions: Bilateral symmetry and lack of condyle centralization were common characteristics among all groups. The greatest condylar decentralization was observed in the Class II group, whereas the least condylar decentralization was found in the normal occlusion group.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Computed tomography evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in Class II Division 1 and Class III malocclusion patients: condylar symmetry and condyle-fossa relationship.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Aug;136(2):199-206. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.033. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009. PMID: 19651349
-
Computed tomography evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in Class I malocclusion patients: condylar symmetry and condyle-fossa relationship.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Aug;136(2):192-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.032. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009. PMID: 19651348
-
Computed Tomography Evaluation of Craniomandibular Articulation in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion and Class I Normal Occlusion Subjects in North Indian Population.ISRN Dent. 2012;2012:312031. doi: 10.5402/2012/312031. Epub 2012 Aug 16. ISRN Dent. 2012. PMID: 22957261 Free PMC article.
-
Computed tomography assessment of temporomandibular joint position and dimensions in patients with class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Mar 1;9(3):e417-e423. doi: 10.4317/jced.53524. eCollection 2017 Mar. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017. PMID: 28298985 Free PMC article.
-
Computed tomography evaluation of temporomandibular joint alterations in patients with class II division 1 subdivision malocclusions: condyle-fossa relationship.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Jul;126(1):48-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.06.012. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004. PMID: 15224058 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Condylar Symmetry and Condyle-Fossa Relationship of the Temporomandibular Joint in Subjects with Normal Occlusion and Malocclusion: A Comparative Study.J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Feb;11(2):ZC29-ZC33. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/21678.9328. Epub 2017 Feb 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017. PMID: 28384976 Free PMC article.
-
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of Lower Facial Asymmetry in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate and Non-Cleft Patients with Class III Skeletal Relationship.PLoS One. 2015 Aug 3;10(8):e0130235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130235. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26237311 Free PMC article.
-
The Correlation Between Morphologic Characteristics of Condyle and Glenoid Fossa with Different Sagittal Patterns of Jaw Assessed by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.Turk J Orthod. 2022 Dec;35(4):268-275. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21136. Turk J Orthod. 2022. PMID: 36594548 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Condylar Position and Its Association with Unilateral TMD in Patients with Angle's Class I, II, and III Malocclusions Using CBCT.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 4):S3973-S3975. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_947_24. Epub 2024 Dec 12. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024. PMID: 39926982 Free PMC article.
-
Cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of the temporomandibular joint and dental characteristics of patients with Class II subdivision malocclusion and asymmetry.Korean J Orthod. 2017 Sep;47(5):277-288. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2017.47.5.277. Epub 2017 Jul 27. Korean J Orthod. 2017. PMID: 28861389 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mongini F. Remodeling of the mandibular condyle in the adult and its relationship to the condition of the dental arches. Acta Anat (Basel) 1972;82:437–53. - PubMed
-
- Mongini F. Dental abrasion as a factor in remodeling of the mandibular condyle. Acta Anat (Basel) 1975;92:292–300. - PubMed
-
- Katsavrias EG, Halazonetis DJ. Condyle and fossa shape in Class II and Class III skeletal patterns: a morphometric tomographic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128:337–46. - PubMed
-
- Wedel A, Carlsson GE, Sagne S. Temporomandibular joint morphology in a medieval skull material. Swed Dent J. 1978;2:177–87. - PubMed
-
- Mongini F. Changes in the temporo-mandibular joint in partial edentulism. Minerva Stomatol. 1968;17:850–58. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources