Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct;32(5):1185-90.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1180-6. Epub 2013 Oct 29.

Transperineal reanastomosis for the treatment for highly recurrent anastomotic strictures as a last option before urinary diversion

Affiliations

Transperineal reanastomosis for the treatment for highly recurrent anastomotic strictures as a last option before urinary diversion

Christoph Philip Reiss et al. World J Urol. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate safety and efficacy of open transperineal reanastomosis (TPRA) for highly recurrent anastomotic strictures (AS) after radical prostatectomy. While the majority of AS can be managed successfully by endoscopic treatment, in highly recurrent AS, open reanastomosis represents a viable therapeutic option.

Methods: Retrospective analysis by standardized questionnaire, inquiring for recurrence, incontinence, sexual function, satisfaction and changes in quality of life (QoL) in 15 patients undergoing TPRA 08/2007-03/2010.

Results: Mean patient age was 65 years (51-75) and mean follow-up 20.5 months (5.8-37.0). Success rate was 93.3 % (14/15). The single recurrence was successfully treated by cold knife incision. Incontinence was found in 93.3 % (14/15) preoperatively and aggravated in 60 % (9/15) after surgery; no de novo incontinence occurred. Implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) has been performed successfully in 10 patients, 2 refused implantation and 2 are scheduled for surgery. Erectile dysfunction was present in 86.7 % (13/15); 13.3 % (2/15) reported a severely declined rigidity. Compared to preoperative status, 33.3 % (5/15) complained about impaired erectile function after TPRA. A good or very good subjective overall health status and an improvement in QoL were noted in 86.7 % (13/15). Patient satisfaction with the outcome of TPRA was high or very high in 13; two were undecided.

Conclusions: After repeated endoscopic treatment, TPRA is a valuable therapeutic option in selected patients with an overall success rate of 93.3 % (14/15) for anastomotic patency, which can even be raised to 100 % by further transurethral surgery. Incontinence can be easily treated by implantation of an AUS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eur Urol. 1998;33(4):382-6 - PubMed
    1. Eur Urol. 2007 Nov;52(5):1499-504 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2005 Apr;173(4):1143-6 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 1990 Apr;143(4):755-8 - PubMed
    1. Br J Urol. 1998 Jun;81(6):823-6 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources