Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct 23:7:682.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00682. eCollection 2013.

The reasoning criminal vs. Homer Simpson: conceptual challenges for crime science

Noémie Bouhana  1
Affiliations

The reasoning criminal vs. Homer Simpson: conceptual challenges for crime science

Noémie Bouhana. Front Hum Neurosci. .

Abstract

A recent disciplinary offshoot of criminology, crime science (CS) defines itself as "the application of science to the control of crime." One of its stated ambitions is to act as a cross-disciplinary linchpin in the domain of crime reduction. Despite many practical successes, notably in the area of situational crime prevention (SCP), CS has yet to achieve a commensurate level of academic visibility. The case is made that the growth of CS is stifled by its reliance on a model of decision-making, the Rational Choice Perspective (RCP), which is inimical to the integration of knowledge and insights from the behavioral, cognitive and neurosciences (CBNs). Examples of salient developments in the CBNs are provided, as regards notably multiple-system perspectives of decision-making and approaches to person-environment interaction. Short and long-term benefits of integration for CS are briefly outlined.

Keywords: crime science; decision-making; rational choice; situational crime prevention; theory.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ackerman J. M., Goldstein N. J., Shapiro J. R., Bargh J. A. (2009). You wear me out: the vicarious depletion of self-control. Psychol. Sci. 20, 326–332 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02290.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baumeister R. F., Vohs K. D., Tice D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 16, 351–355 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00534.x - DOI
    1. Becker W. J., Cropanzano R. (2010). Organizational neuroscience: the promise and prospects of an emerging discipline. J. Organ. Behav. 31, 1055–1059 10.1002/job.668 - DOI
    1. Bolhuis J. J., Brown G. R., Richardson R. C., Laland K. N. (2011). Darwin in mind: new opportunities for evolutionary psychology. PLoS Biol. 9:e1001109 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001109 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bowers K., Johnson S. (2004). Who commits near repeats? A test of the boost explanation. West. Crim. Rev. 5, 12–24

LinkOut - more resources