Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Jul;91(1):74-81.
doi: 10.1007/BF00220861.

Mapping dominant markers using F2 matings

Affiliations

Mapping dominant markers using F2 matings

S J Knapp et al. Theor Appl Genet. 1995 Jul.

Abstract

The development of efficient methods for amplifying random DNA sequences by the polymerase chain reaction has created the basis for mapping virtually unlimited numbers of mixed-phase dominant DNA markers in one population. Although dominant markers can be efficiently mapped using many different kinds of matings, recombination frequencies and locus orders are often mis-estimated from repulsion F2 matings. The major problem with these matings, apart from excessive sampling errors of recombination frequency (θ) estimates, is the bias of the maximum-likelihood estimator (MLE) of θ (θ ML). [Formula: see text] when the observed frequency of double-recessive phenotypes is 0 and the observed frequency of double-dominant phenotypes is less than 2/3 - the bias for those samples is - θ. We used simulation to estimate the mean bias of θ ML. Mean bias is a function of n and θ and decreases as n increases. Valid maps of dominant markers can be built by using sub-sets of markers linked in coupling, thereby creating male and feamle coupling maps, as long as the maps are fairly dense (about 5 cM) - the sampling errors of θ increase as θ increases for coupling linkages and are equal to those for backcross matings when θ=0. The use of F2 matings for mapping dominant markers is not necessarily proscribed because they yield twice as many useful markers as a backcross population, albeit in two maps, for the same number of DNA extractions and PCR assays; however, dominant markers can be more effeciently exploited by using doubled-haploid, recombinant-inbred, or other inbred populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Dec 25;18(24):7213-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1980 Mar;32(2):212-22 - PubMed
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1990 Sep;47(3):470-82 - PubMed
    1. Ann Hum Genet. 1982 Oct;46(4):363-72 - PubMed
    1. Trends Genet. 1993 Aug;9(8):275-80 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources