Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Dec;36(12):3882-7.
doi: 10.2337/dc12-1956. Epub 2013 Oct 29.

Day and night closed-loop control in adults with type 1 diabetes: a comparison of two closed-loop algorithms driving continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus patient self-management

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Day and night closed-loop control in adults with type 1 diabetes: a comparison of two closed-loop algorithms driving continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus patient self-management

Yoeri M Luijf et al. Diabetes Care. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To compare two validated closed-loop (CL) algorithms versus patient self-control with CSII in terms of glycemic control.

Research design and methods: This study was a multicenter, randomized, three-way crossover, open-label trial in 48 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus for at least 6 months, treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Blood glucose was controlled for 23 h by the algorithm of the Universities of Pavia and Padova with a Safety Supervision Module developed at the Universities of Virginia and California at Santa Barbara (international artificial pancreas [iAP]), by the algorithm of University of Cambridge (CAM), or by patients themselves in open loop (OL) during three hospital admissions including meals and exercise. The main analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. Main outcome measures included time spent in target (glucose levels between 3.9 and 8.0 mmol/L or between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L after meals).

Results: Time spent in the target range was similar in CL and OL: 62.6% for OL, 59.2% for iAP, and 58.3% for CAM. While mean glucose level was significantly lower in OL (7.19, 8.15, and 8.26 mmol/L, respectively) (overall P = 0.001), percentage of time spent in hypoglycemia (<3.9 mmol/L) was almost threefold reduced during CL (6.4%, 2.1%, and 2.0%) (overall P = 0.001) with less time ≤2.8 mmol/L (overall P = 0.038). There were no significant differences in outcomes between algorithms.

Conclusions: Both CAM and iAP algorithms provide safe glycemic control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of the admission day. Patients underwent OL or CL control and were served three meals. The admission day also included an exercise bout. CL control was continuous for 23 h.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean glucose profiles over time for OL, CAM, and iAP. Meals were given at 1900 h, 0800 h, and 1200 h. Exercise was performed at 1500 h. The dashed lines mark the target range. m, minute.

References

    1. Watkins KW, Connell CM, Fitzgerald JT, Klem L, Hickey T, Ingersoll-Dayton B. Effect of adults’ self-regulation of diabetes on quality-of-life outcomes. Diabetes Care 2000;23:1511–1515 - PubMed
    1. Cobelli C, Renard E, Kovatchev B. Artificial pancreas: past, present, future. Diabetes 2011;60:2672–2682 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clemens AH, Chang PH, Myers RW. The development of Biostator, a Glucose Controlled Insulin Infusion System (GCIIS). Horm Metab Res 1977;7(Suppl. 7):23–33 - PubMed
    1. Hovorka R. Closed-loop insulin delivery: from bench to clinical practice. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2011;7:385–395 - PubMed
    1. Steil GM, Rebrin K. Closed-loop insulin delivery—what lies between where we are and where we are going? Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2005;2:353–362 - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data