Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Spring;3(2):11-6.
Epub 2008 Apr 2.

Comparison of Canal Preparation Pattern of K3 and ProTaper Rotary Files in Curved Resin Blocks

Affiliations

Comparison of Canal Preparation Pattern of K3 and ProTaper Rotary Files in Curved Resin Blocks

Nahid Mohammadzade Akhlaghi et al. Iran Endod J. 2008 Spring.

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare canal preparation pattern of K3 and ProTaper rotary files in curved resin blocks.

Materials and methods: Twenty-four resin blocks were used in this experimental study and randomly divided into two groups. Their initial images were scanned. After preparation, their images were scanned again in the same position. Pre and post preparation images were superimposed by Photoshop software and the removed resin was measured in 5 different points, and then analyzed statistically by ANOVA and t-test.

Results: At O point (orifice), significantly (p<0.05) more outer canal wall was removed in the ProTaper group than in the K3 group. There was no significant difference at any other points of outer wall. Removed material of inner canal wall was not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusion: Under the condition of this study, both systems performed acceptable preparation pattern except at the beginning of the curve.

Keywords: K3; ProTaper; Root Canal Preparation; Root Canal Transportation; Rotary Files.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
All measurements were made perpendicular to the axis of the pre-instrumentation canal using the image analysis software.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of material removal (mm) from outer and inner canal walls at different measuring points for each file
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of material removal (mm) for two different files at different measuring points for inner and outer canal walls

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am. 1974;18:269–96. - PubMed
    1. Walton RE, Rivera EM. Cleaning and shaping. In: Walton RE, Torabinejad M, editors. Principles and practice of Endodontics. 3 rd Edition. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: W.B. Saunders; 2002. pp. 206–38.
    1. Weine FS, Kelly RF, Lio PJ. The effect of preparation on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. J Endod. 1975;1:255–62. - PubMed
    1. European Society of Endodontology. Consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology on quality guidelines for endodontic treatment. Int Endod J. 1994;27:115–24. - PubMed
    1. Ayar LR, Love RM. Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments when used in variable tip sequence in simulated curved root canals. Int Endod J. 2004;37:593–601. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources