Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;101(6):536-44.
doi: 10.5935/abc.20130213. Epub 2013 Nov 1.

Experimental cardiac arrest treatment with adrenaline, vasopressin, or placebo

[Article in English, Portuguese]

Experimental cardiac arrest treatment with adrenaline, vasopressin, or placebo

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Manoel Ângelo Gomes Palácio et al. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Background: The effect of vasoconstrictors in prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has not been fully clarified.

Objectives: To evaluate adrenaline and vasopressin pressure effect, and observe the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).

Methods: A prospective, randomized, blinded, and placebo-controlled study. After seven minutes of untreated ventricular fibrillation, pigs received two minutes cycles of CPR. Defibrillation was attempted (4 J/kg) once at 9 minutes, and after every cycle if a shockable rhythm was present, after what CPR was immediately resumed. At 9 minutes and every five minutes intervals, 0.02 mg/kg (n = 12 pigs) adrenaline, or 0.4 U/kg (n = 12) vasopressin, or 0.2 mL/kg (n = 8) 0.9% saline solution was administered. CPR continued for 30 minutes or until the ROSC.

Results: Coronary perfusion pressure increased to about 20 mmHg in the three groups. Following vasoconstrictors doses, pressure level reached 35 mmHg versus 15 mmHg with placebo (p < 0.001). Vasopressin effect remained at 15-20 mmHg after three doses versus zero with adrenaline or placebo. ROSC rate differed (p = 0.031) among adrenaline (10/12), vasopressin (6/12), and placebo (2/8). Time-to-ROSC did not differ (16 minutes), nor the number of doses previously received (one or two). There was no difference between vasoconstrictors, but against placebo, only adrenaline significantly increased the ROSC rate (p = 0.019).

Conclusion: The vasoconstrictors initial pressure effect was equivalent and vasopressin maintained a late effect at prolonged resuscitation. Nevertheless, when compared with placebo, only adrenaline significantly increased the ROSC rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Protocol design of experimental cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate and survival curve adaptation of pigs in ventricular fibrillation, potentially alive during resuscitation efforts and with all deaths occurring at 37 minutes, according to randomized and blinded treatment
Figure 3
Figure 3
Coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) mean ± standard error, pre-cardiac arrest at time zero, and during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) initiated at 7 minutes of ventricular fibrillation (VF), according to randomized and blinded treatment applied (T) repeatedly. Asterisks indicate timepoints of pressure increase with vasoconstrictors, wich remained significant with vasopressin. The pigs count decreases until 14 animals that not resuscitated: adrenaline 2/12, vasopressin 6/12, and placebo 6/8.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate accumulated until the last resuscitated pig in each treatment group.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Parameters: mean ± stardard error of pressures, expired carbon dioxide (ETCO2), and respiratory rate, pre-cardiac arrest at time zero, and during cardiopulmonary resuscitation started at 7 minutes, according to randomized and blinded treatment applied in pigs electrically induced to ventricular fibrillation. Manual chest compression rate was similar (99.5 ± 0.1). Following vasoconstrictors treatment at 9 minutes, there was significant effect (compared with placebo) on the aortic pressure only

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cooper JA, Cooper JD, Cooper JM. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: history, current practice, and future direction. Circulation. 2006;114(25):2839–2849. - PubMed
    1. Dünser MW, Lindner KH, Wenzel V. A century of arginine vasopressin research leading to new therapeutic strategies. Anesthesiology. 2006;105(3):444–445. - PubMed
    1. Babbs CF, Berg RA, Kette F, Kloeck WG, Lindner KH, Lurie KG, et al. American Heart AssociationInternational Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Use of pressures in the treatment of cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37(4 ) Suppl:S152–S162. - PubMed
    1. Kern KB, Ewy GA, Voorhees WD, Babbs CF, Tacker WA. Myocardial perfusion pressure: a predictor of 24-hour survival during prolonged cardiac arrest in dogs. Resuscitation. 1988;16(4):241–250. - PubMed
    1. Paradis NA, Martin GB, Rivers EP, Goetting MG, Appleton TJ, Feingold M, et al. Coronary perfusion pressure and the return of spontaneous circulation in human cardiopulmonary resuscitation. JAMA. 1990;263(8):1106–1113. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms