Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2014 Jan;34(1):53-62.
doi: 10.1007/s40261-013-0149-y.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of the short-acting β1-adrenergic receptor blocker landiolol hydrochloride for coronary computed tomography angiography in Japanese patients with suspected ischemic cardiac disease

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of the short-acting β1-adrenergic receptor blocker landiolol hydrochloride for coronary computed tomography angiography in Japanese patients with suspected ischemic cardiac disease

Masaharu Hirano et al. Clin Drug Investig. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives and background: The objective of this study was to investigate the image quality-improving and heart rate-lowering effects of landiolol hydrochloride (a short-acting β1-adrenergic receptor blocker) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). During CCTA, β-adrenergic receptor blockers have been commonly used to lower heart rate and improve image quality.

Methods: A total of 258 subjects suspected of having ischemic cardiac disease and requiring CCTA were randomized to either a landiolol hydrochloride 0.125 mg/kg group or placebo group to study the efficacy and safety of landiolol hydrochloride in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized parallel study. The primary endpoint was the diagnosable proportion (proportion of subjects whose coronary stenosis was diagnosable).

Results: The diagnosable proportions about the reconstruction images at mid-diastole were 68.2 and 38.2 % in the landiolol hydrochloride and placebo group, respectively, indicating significant superiority of landiolol hydrochloride over placebo (p < 0.0001). The diagnosable proportions about the optimal reconstruction images were 81.4 and 54.2 % in the landiolol hydrochloride and placebo group, respectively, indicating significant superiority of landiolol hydrochloride over placebo (p < 0.0001). The mean heart rate-lowering effect was first observed soon after administration of landiolol hydrochloride, was most marked at 3-5 min, and disappeared 30 min after completion of administration. The mean heart rate-lowering proportion at that time was -19.1 ± 8.1 % and -5.9 ± 9.7 % in the landiolol hydrochloride and placebo groups, respectively, showing a significantly higher proportion in the landiolol hydrochloride group.

Conclusions: Landiolol hydrochloride was confirmed to significantly and rapidly lower heart rate after intravenous injection, suggesting that it is a safe and useful agent for improving the image quality of CCTA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Time flow of study drug administration. The study drug was administered over 1 min, ≥5 min after nitrate drug administration. CCTA coronary computed tomography angiography, CT computed tomography
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow diagram of subjects
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean ± standard deviation changes in heart rate. Rotation speed of the X-ray tube was set at the maximum speed for each type of computed tomography equipment. CCTA coronary computed tomography angiography, CT computed tomography, *p < 0.05 vs. placebo (t test)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean ± standard deviation changes in blood pressure. Mean blood pressure showed a significant difference between the two groups, but the lowering proportion was limited, as shown in Table 3. CCTA coronary computed tomography angiography, CT computed tomography, *p < 0.05 vs. placebo (t test)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Relationship between diagnosable proportion and heart rate. There was a positive correlation between the diagnosable proportion and heart rate

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bluemke DA, Achenbach S, Budoff M, et al. Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed tomography angiography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young. Circulation. 2008;118:586–606. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.189695. - DOI - PubMed
    1. American College of Cardiography Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. Mark DB, Berman DS, Budoff MJ, et al. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. Circulation. 2010;2010(121):2509–2543. - PubMed
    1. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation. 2005;112:2318–2323. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.533471. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2324–2336. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806576. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ropers U, Ropers D, Pflederer T, et al. Influence of heart rate on the diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:2393–2398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.017. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms