Clinical factors that predict successful posterior urethral anastomosis with a gracilis muscle flap
- PMID: 24175047
- PMCID: PMC3806997
- DOI: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.10.710
Clinical factors that predict successful posterior urethral anastomosis with a gracilis muscle flap
Abstract
Purpose: We evaluated the preoperative clinical factors that affect the surgical outcome of posterior urethral anastomosis (PUA) with a gracilis muscle flap (GMF) to determine which factors predict benefit from the use of the GMF.
Materials and methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 49 patients who underwent a delayed PUA with a GMF. A successful clinical outcome was defined as achieving a peak urinary flow rate greater than 15 mL/s at 3 and 12 months postoperatively without evidence of stricture recurrence on a retrograde urethrogram or cystourethroscopy at 3 months postoperatively. Multiple clinical factors were evaluated by use of univariate and multivariate analyses.
Results: The outcome of 21 of 49 patients (42.9%) was deemed successful. The mean age of the 49 patients was 37.2±13.5 years and the mean follow-up duration was 43.4±28.0 months. The length of the urethral defect was significantly shorter in patients with a successful outcome than in patients with an unsuccessful outcome (p=0.010). The outcome differed significantly depending on whether the patients had a previously successful urethroplasty (p=0.036) or whether they had suffered a pelvic bone injury (p=0.012). Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that a previous urethroplasty was the only preoperative clinical factor that significantly affected the surgical outcome in PUA with a GMF (odds ratio, 0.218; 95% confidence interval, 0.050 to 0.947; p=0.042).
Conclusions: A history of previous urethroplasty is a preoperative clinical factor that significantly affects the surgical outcome in PUA with a GMF; the procedure is more likely to be successful in patients who have not previously undergone urethroplasty.
Keywords: Surgical anastomosis; Surgical flap; Urethral stricture.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Urethroplasty for high risk, long segment urethral strictures with ventral buccal mucosa graft and gracilis muscle flap.J Urol. 2015 Mar;193(3):902-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.093. Epub 2014 Sep 28. J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25261802
-
Analysis of the factors involved in the failure of urethroplasty in men.Actas Urol Esp. 2014 Mar;38(2):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Sep 17. Actas Urol Esp. 2014. PMID: 24051326 English, Spanish.
-
Impact of prior urethral manipulation on outcome of anastomotic urethroplasty for post-traumatic urethral stricture.Urology. 2010 Jan;75(1):179-82. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.081. Epub 2009 Oct 24. Urology. 2010. PMID: 19854488
-
[Clinical effect of pedicled scrotal septal flap urethroplasty on long-segment posterior urethral stricture].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Aug;23(8):937-9. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009. PMID: 19728610 Chinese.
-
Post-traumatic posterior urethral strictures: preoperative decision making.Urology. 2004 Aug;64(2):228-31. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.03.019. Urology. 2004. PMID: 15302466 Review.
Cited by
-
Transperineal anastomotic posterior urethroplasty with bulbocavernosus flap and fibrin sealant in the complicated posterior urethral stricture reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study.Int J Surg. 2024 Feb 1;110(2):668-674. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000890. Int J Surg. 2024. PMID: 37983809 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Morey AF, McAninch JW. Reconstruction of posterior urethral disruption injuries: outcome analysis in 82 patients. J Urol. 1997;157:506–510. - PubMed
-
- Webster GD, Ramon J. Repair of pelvic fracture posterior urethral defects using an elaborated perineal approach: experience with 74 cases. J Urol. 1991;145:744–748. - PubMed
-
- Pratap A, Agrawal CS, Pandit RK, Sapkota G, Anchal N. Factors contributing to a successful outcome of combined abdominal transpubic perineal urethroplasty for complex posterior urethral disruptions. J Urol. 2006;176(6 Pt 1):2514–2517. - PubMed
-
- Zmora O, Tulchinsky H, Gur E, Goldman G, Klausner JM, Rabau M. Gracilis muscle transposition for fistulas between the rectum and urethra or vagina. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:1316–1321. - PubMed
-
- Ulrich D, Roos J, Jakse G, Pallua N. Gracilis muscle interposition for the treatment of recto-urethral and rectovaginal fistulas: a retrospective analysis of 35 cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:352–356. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources