Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Feb 24;2(1):9-18.
doi: 10.5500/wjt.v2.i1.9.

Key issues in transplant tourism

Affiliations
Review

Key issues in transplant tourism

Jacob A Akoh. World J Transplant. .

Abstract

Access to organ transplantation depends on national circumstances, and is partly determined by the cost of health care, availability of transplant services, the level of technical capacity and the availability of organs. Commercial transplantation is estimated to account for 5%-10% (3500-7000) of kidney transplants performed annually throughout the world. This review is to determine the state and outcome of renal transplantation associated with transplant tourism (TT) and the key challenges with such transplantation. The stakeholders of commercial transplantation include: patients on the waiting lists in developed countries or not on any list in developing countries; dialysis funding bodies; middlemen, hosting transplant centres; organ-exporting countries; and organ vendors. TT and commercial kidney transplants are associated with a high incidence of surgical complications, acute rejection and invasive infection which cause major morbidity and mortality. There are ethical and medical concerns regarding the management of recipients of organs from vendors. The growing demand for transplantation, the perceived failure of altruistic donation in providing enough organs has led to calls for a legalised market in organ procurement or regulated trial in incentives for donation. Developing transplant services worldwide has many benefits - improving results of transplantation as they would be performed legally, increasing the donor pool and making TT unnecessary. Meanwhile there is a need to re-examine intrinsic attitudes to TT bearing in mind the cultural and economic realities of globalisation. Perhaps the World Health Organization in conjunction with The Transplantation Society would set up a working party of stakeholders to study this matter in greater detail and make recommendations.

Keywords: Complication; Graft survival; Infection; Living unrelated donor; Organ trafficking; Patient survival; Transplant commercialism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Types of transplant tourism. Model I: Recipient (R) travels to country B where donor (D) and transplant centre (TC) are; Model II: R and D travel to another country for transplantation; Model III: D travels to country C where R and TC are; Model IV: D and R residing in different countries travel to another country (C) for transplantation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Evans RW. Ethnocentrism is an unacceptable rationale for health care policy: a critique of transplant tourism position statements. Am J Transplant. 2008;8:1089–1095. - PubMed
    1. Pafford B. The third wave--medical tourism in the 21st century. South Med J. 2009;102:810–813. - PubMed
    1. Merion RM, Barnes AD, Lin M, Ashby VB, McBride V, Ortiz-Rios E, Welch JC, Levine GN, Port FK, Burdick J. Transplants in Foreign Countries Among Patients Removed from the US Transplant Waiting List. Am J Transplant. 2008;8:988–996. - PubMed
    1. Cohen DJ. Transplant tourism: a growing phenomenon. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. 2009;5:128–129. - PubMed
    1. Alghamdi SA, Nabi ZG, Alkhafaji DM, Askandrani SA, Abdelsalam MS, Shukri MM, Eldali AM, Adra CN, Alkurbi LA, Albaqumi MN. Transplant tourism outcome: a single center experience. Transplantation. 2010;90:184–188. - PubMed