Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov 1:13:457.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-457.

Diagnostic data for neurological conditions in interRAI assessments in home care, nursing home and mental health care settings: a validity study

Affiliations

Diagnostic data for neurological conditions in interRAI assessments in home care, nursing home and mental health care settings: a validity study

Andrea D Foebel et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: The interRAI suite of assessment instruments can provide valuable information to support person-specific care planning across the continuum of care. Comprehensive clinical information is collected with these instruments, including disease diagnoses. In Canada, interRAI data holdings represent some of the largest repositories of clinical information in the country for persons with neurological conditions. This study examined the accuracy of the diagnostic information captured by interRAI instruments designed for use in the home care, long-term care and mental health care settings as compared with national administrative databases.

Methods: The interRAI assessments were matched with an inpatient hospital record and emergency department (ED) visit record in the preceding 90 days. Diagnoses captured on the interRAI instruments were compared to those recorded in either administrative record for each individual. Diagnostic validity was examined through sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value analysis for the following conditions: multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, Parkinson's disease, traumatic brain injury, stroke, diabetes mellitus, heart failure and reactive airway disease.

Results: In the three large study samples (home care: n = 128,448; long-term care: n = 26,644; mental health: n = 13,812), interRAI diagnoses demonstrated high specificity when compared to administrative records, for both neurological conditions (range 0.80-1.00) and comparative chronic diseases (range 0.83-1.00). Sensitivity and positive predictive values (PPV) were more varied by specific diagnosis, with sensitivities and PPV for neurological conditions ranging from 0.23 to 0.94 and 0.14 to 0.77, respectively. The interRAI assessments routinely captured more cases of the diagnoses of interest than the administrative records.

Conclusions: The interRAI assessment collected accurate information about disease diagnoses when compared to administrative records within three months. Such information is likely relevant to day-to-day care in these three environments and can be used to inform care planning and resource allocation decisions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sample selection in home care, long-term care and mental health settings. 1Includes assessments from Ontario (99.9%) and Yukon Territory (0.1%). 2Includes assessments from British Columbia (0.1%), Ontario (99.8%) and Yukon Territory (0.1%). 3All assessments are from facilities in Ontario.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bernabei R, Gray L, Hirdes J, Pei X, Henrard JC, Jonsson PV, Onder G, Gambassi G, Ikegami N, Ranhoff AH, Carpenter IG, Harwood RH, Fries BE, Morris JN, Steel K. In: Hazzard’s Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology. 6. Halter JB, Ouslander JG, Tinetti ME, Studenski S, High KP, Asthana S, editor. New York: McGraw Medical; 2009. International gerontology; pp. 69–96.
    1. Fries BE, Schroll M, Hawes C, Gilgen R, Jonsson PV, Park P. Approaching cross-national comparisons of nursing home residents. Age Ageing. 1997;13(Suppl 2):13–18. doi: 10.1093/ageing/26.suppl_2.13. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morris JN, Hawes C, Fries BE, Phillips CD, Mor V, Katz S, Murphy K, Drugovich ML, Friedlob AS. Designing the national resident assessment instrument for nursing homes. Gerontologist. 1990;13(3):293–307. doi: 10.1093/geront/30.3.293. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hirdes JP, Mitchell L, Maxwell CJ, White N. Beyond the 'iron lungs of gerontology’: using evidence to shape the future of nursing homes in Canada. Can J Aging. 2011;13(3):371–390. doi: 10.1017/S0714980811000304. Epub 2011 Aug 19. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Onder G, Carpenter I, Finne-Soveri H, Gindin J, Frijters D, Henrard JC, Nikolaus T, Topinkova E, Tosato M, Liperoti R, Landi F, Bernabei R. SHELTER project. Assessment of nursing home residents in Europe: the Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm care (SHELTER) study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;13:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms