Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov;166(5):895-903.e1.
doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Oct 7.

Risk stratification for death and all-cause hospitalization in heart failure clinic outpatients

Affiliations

Risk stratification for death and all-cause hospitalization in heart failure clinic outpatients

Scott L Hummel et al. Am Heart J. 2013 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Most heart failure (HF) risk stratification models were developed for inpatient use, and available outpatient models use a complex set of variables. We hypothesized that routinely collected clinical data could predict the 6-month risk of death and all-cause medical hospitalization in HF clinic outpatients.

Methods and results: Using a quality improvement database and multivariable Cox modeling, we derived the Heart Failure Patient Severity Index (HFPSI) in the University of Michigan HF clinic (UM cohort, n = 1,536; 314 reached primary outcome). We externally validated the HFPSI in the Ann Arbor Veterans' Affairs HF clinic (VA cohort, n = 445; 106 outcomes) and explored "real-time" HFPSI use (VA-RT cohort, n = 486; 141 outcomes) by tracking VA patients for 6 months from their most recently calculated HFPSI, rather than using an arbitrary start date for the cohort. The HFPSI model included blood urea nitrogen, B-type natriuretic peptide, New York Heart Association class, diabetes status, history of atrial fibrillation/flutter, and all-cause hospitalization within the prior 1 and 2 to 6 months. The concordance c statistics in the UM/VA/VA-RT cohorts were 0.71/0.68/0.74. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank testing demonstrated excellent risk stratification, particularly between a large, low-risk group (40% of patients, 6-month event rates in the UM/VA/VA-RT cohorts 8%/12%/12%) and a small, high-risk group (10% of patients, 6-month event rates in the UM/VA/VA-RT cohorts 57%/58%/79%).

Conclusions: The HFPSI uses readily available data to predict the 6-month risk of death and/or all-cause medical hospitalization in HF clinic outpatients and could potentially help allocate specialized HF resources within health systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cohort composition and time frame for outcome assessment. Abbreviations: LVAD, left ventricular assist device; UM, University of Michigan; VA, Veterans Affairs; VA-RT, Veterans Affairs Real-Time.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Survival free of death and all-cause medical hospitalization, HFPSI score decile groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Survival free of death and all-cause medical hospitalization, HFPSI integer score group.

References

    1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, et al. on behalf of the American Heart Association Statistics Committee, Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2010 update. Circulation. 2010;121:e46–215. - PubMed
    1. Chen J, Normand S-LT, Wang Y, et al. National and regional trends in heart failure hospitalization and mortality rates for Medicare beneficiaries, 1998-2008. JAMA. 2011;306:1669–78. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Klersy C, De Silvestri A, Gabutti G, et al. A meta-analysis of remote monitoring of heart failure patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:1683–94. - PubMed
    1. Gohler A, Januzzi JL, Worrell SS, et al. A systematic meta-analysis of the efficacy and heterogeneity of disease management programs in congestive heart failure. J Card Fail. 2006;12:554–67. - PubMed
    1. Galbreath AD, Krasuski RA, Smith B, et al. Long-term healthcare and cost outcomes of disease management in a large, randomized, community-based population with heart failure. Circulation. 2004;110:3518–26. [see comment]. [erratum appears in Circulation. 2004 dec 7;110(23):3615]. - PubMed

Publication types