Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Feb 1;65(2):171-9.
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200274.

Illness management and recovery: a review of the literature

Review

Illness management and recovery: a review of the literature

Alan B McGuire et al. Psychiatr Serv. .

Abstract

Objective: Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) is a standardized psychosocial intervention that is designed to help people with severe mental illness manage their illness and achieve personal recovery goals. This literature review summarizes the research on consumer-level effects of IMR and articles describing its implementation.

Methods: In 2011, the authors conducted a literature search of Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library by using the key words "illness management and recovery," "wellness management and recovery," or "IMR" AND ("schizophrenia" OR "bipolar" OR "depression" OR "recovery" OR "mental health"). Publications that cited two seminal IMR articles also guided further exploration of sources. Articles that did not deal explicitly with IMR or a direct adaptation were excluded.

Results: Three randomized-controlled trials (RCTs), three quasi-controlled trials, and three pre-post trials have been conducted. The RCTs found that consumers receiving IMR reported significantly more improved scores on the IMR Scale (IMRS) than consumers who received treatment as usual. IMRS ratings by clinicians and ratings of psychiatric symptoms by independent observers were also more improved for the IMR consumers. Implementation studies (N=16) identified several important barriers to and facilitators of IMR, including supervision and agency support. Implementation outcomes, such as participation rates and fidelity, varied widely.

Conclusions: IMR shows promise for improving some consumer-level outcomes. Important issues regarding implementation require additional study. Future research is needed to compare outcomes of IMR consumers and active control groups and to provide a more detailed understanding of how other services utilized by consumers may affect outcomes of IMR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

disclosures: The authors report no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mueser KT, Corrigan PW, Hilton DW, et al. Illness Management and Recovery: a review of the research. Psychiatric Services. 2002;53:1272–1284. - PubMed
    1. Mueser KT, Meyer PS, Penn DL, et al. The Illness Management and Recovery program: rationale, development, and preliminary findings. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2006;32:32–43. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drake RE, Goldman HH, Leff HS, et al. Implementing evidence-based practices in routine mental health service settings. Psychiatric Services. 2001;52:179–182. - PubMed
    1. Liberman RP, Mueser KT, Wallace CJ, et al. Training skills in the psychiatrically disabled: learning coping and competence. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 1986;12:631–647. - PubMed
    1. Mueser KT, Gingerich S, editors. Illness Management and Recovery Implementation Resource Kit. Rockville, Md: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services; 2002.

Publication types