Asbestos bodies and the diagnosis of asbestosis in chrysotile workers

Abstract

It has been suggested that because chrysotile asbestos forms asbestos bodies poorly, use of the traditional histologic requirements (diffuse interstitial fibrosis plus asbestos bodies) for the diagnosis of asbestosis, may lead to an underdiagnosis of this condition in workers exposed only to chrysotile. We examined lungs from 25 chrysotile miners with diffuse interstitial fibrosis. Asbestos bodies were found easily in histologic section using hematoxylin and eosin stains in all cases. Mineralogic analysis of four cases showed that 46 of 72 (64%) bodies isolated and examined contained chrysotile cores, and 21 of 72 (29%) bodies contained cores of the amphiboles tremolite and actinolite. By contrast, tremolite and actinolite constituted the majority of uncoated fibers in these cases. The mean length for bodies formed on chrysotile was 35 micron, and for bodies formed on tremolite or actinolite, 36 micron. We conclude that (1) the usual histologic criteria for the diagnosis of asbestos are applicable to chrysotile-exposed workers; (2) in workers with occupational chrysotile exposure, bodies form readily on this mineral; and (3) asbestos bodies in these lungs reflect the presence of long asbestos fibers.