Computer-aided analysis of 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography: a comparison with manual interpretation
- PMID: 24179636
- PMCID: PMC3805166
- DOI: 10.4081/hi.2013.e2
Computer-aided analysis of 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography: a comparison with manual interpretation
Abstract
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is increasingly used for the assessment of coronary heart disease (CHD) in symptomatic patients. Software applications have recently been developed to facilitate efficient and accurate analysis of CCTA. This study aims to evaluate the clinical application of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) software for the detection of significant coronary stenosis on CCTA in populations with low (8%), moderate (13%), and high (27%) CHD prevalence. A total of 341 consecutive patients underwent 64-slice CCTA at 3 clinical sites in the United States. CAD software performed automatic detection of significant coronary lesions (>50% stenosis). CAD results were then compared to the consensus manual interpretation of 2 imaging experts. Data analysis was conducted for each patient and segment. The CAD had 100% sensitivity per patient across all 3 clinical sites. Specificity in the low, moderate, and high CHD prevalence populations was 64%, 41%, and 38%, respectively. The negative predictive value at the 3 clinical sites was 100%. The positive predictive value was 22%, 21%, and 38% for the low, moderate, and high CHD prevalence populations, respectively. This study demonstrates the utility of CAD software in 3 distinct clinical settings. In a low-prevalence population, such as seen in the emergency department, CAD can be used as a Computer-Aided Simple Triage tool to assist in diagnostic delineation of acute chest pain. In a higher prevalence population, CAD software is useful as an adjunct for both the experienced and inexperienced reader.
Keywords: computed aided diagnosis; coronary computed tomography angiography; coronary heart disease.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interests: MP, minor research grant support from Rcadia and Toshiba; Speakers Bureau of Toshiba. RG, employee of Rcadia. All the other authors declare no potential conflictsof interests.
Figures

References
-
- Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. New Eng J Med 2008;359:2324–36 - PubMed
-
- Meijboom WB, Meijs MFL, Schuijf JD, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:2135–44 - PubMed
-
- Goldstein JA, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, et al. A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:863–71 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous