Experience with biodegradable polymer coated sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system in "real-life" percutaneous coronary intervention: 24-month data from the manipal-s registry
- PMID: 24179909
- PMCID: PMC3809648
- DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5915.3369
Experience with biodegradable polymer coated sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system in "real-life" percutaneous coronary intervention: 24-month data from the manipal-s registry
Abstract
Introduction: Despite the undeniable clinical efficacy of drug-eluting stents with durable polymers, concerns regarding their long-term safety have been raised, especially in more complex subsets. The Manipal-S Registry was designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the biodegradable polymer coated Supralimus(®) Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent for the treatment of coronary artery disease, across a wide range of patients who are treated in real-life clinical practice.
Methods: All the consecutive 116 patients who underwent single-vessel or multiple vessel percutaneous coronary interventions with the use of Supralimus(®) sirolimus-eluting stents between September 2009 and December 2010, were included in this study. Patients were clinically followed-up at 1, 9, 12 and 24 months post-procedure. All clinical, procedural, and follow-up information were collected and analysed.
Results: In total 116 patients, 126 lesions were implanted with 144 stents which had an average stent length of 25.8±8.0 mm. The incidences of any major adverse cardiac and cerebral events at 1, 9, 12 and 24 months were 0, 5 (4.3%), 8 (6.9%), and 10 (8.6%) respectively.
Conclusion: These 24-month results clearly provide evidence for safety and effectiveness of the Supralimus(®) Sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system with the biodegradable polymer in real-life patients, even in those with acute myocardial infarctions.
Keywords: Biodegradable polymer; Coronary artery disease; Sirolimus-eluting stent.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Very thin strut biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents in allcomers with coronary artery disease (BIO-RESORT): a three-arm, randomised, non-inferiority trial.Lancet. 2016 Nov 26;388(10060):2607-2617. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31920-1. Epub 2016 Oct 30. Lancet. 2016. PMID: 27806902 Clinical Trial.
-
The real world experience of the biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system: Results From an "All-Comers" Clinical Experience.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Sep;88(3):E93-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25246. Epub 2014 Jan 7. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016. PMID: 24307634
-
Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (BIOSTEMI): a single-blind, prospective, randomised superiority trial.Lancet. 2019 Oct 5;394(10205):1243-1253. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31877-X. Epub 2019 Sep 2. Lancet. 2019. PMID: 31488372 Clinical Trial.
-
Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Aug 15;18(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0902-5. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018. PMID: 30111289 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents vs durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of individual patient data from 5 randomized trials.Am Heart J. 2021 May;235:140-148. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Feb 17. Am Heart J. 2021. PMID: 33609498 Review.
Cited by
-
Seven-year clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with biodegradable polymer coated sirolimus-eluting stent: Results from a single-center real-world experience.Indian Heart J. 2018 Dec;70 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S280-S284. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 May 26. Indian Heart J. 2018. PMID: 30595275 Free PMC article.
-
Twelve-months clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting coronary stent in real-world patients: A single-center experience.Indian Heart J. 2021 Jan-Feb;73(1):114-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.12.009. Epub 2020 Dec 29. Indian Heart J. 2021. PMID: 33714395 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Al Suwaidi J, Berger PB, Holmes DR, Jr. Coronary artery stents. JAMA. 2000;284(14):1828–36. - PubMed
-
- Brophy JM, Belisle P, Joseph L. Evidence for use of coronary stents. A hierarchical bayesian meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(10):777–86. - PubMed
-
- Nordmann AJ, Hengstler P, Leimenstoll BM, Harr T, Young J, Bucher HC. Clinical outcomes of stents versus balloon angioplasty in non-acute coronary artery disease. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur Heart J. 2004;25(1):69–80. - PubMed
-
- Elezi S, Kastrati A, Neumann FJ, Hadamitzky M, Dirschinger J, Schomig A. Vessel size and long-term outcome after coronary stent placement. Circulation. 1998;98(18):1875–80. - PubMed
-
- Mercado N, Boersma E, Wijns W, Gersh BJ, Morillo CA, de Valk V, van Es GA. Grobbee DE, Serruys PW. Clinical and quantitative coronary angiographic predictors of coronary restenosis: a comparative analysis from the balloon-to-stent era. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(3):645–52. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources