Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep;7(9):2042-6.
doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6005.3401. Epub 2013 Sep 10.

Effect of Two Desensitizing Agents in Reducing Dentin Hypersensitivity: An in-vivo Comparative Clinical Trial

Affiliations

Effect of Two Desensitizing Agents in Reducing Dentin Hypersensitivity: An in-vivo Comparative Clinical Trial

Nilesh Arjun Torwane et al. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: A randomized, double blind, split mouth, controlled clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of two desensitizing agents on reduction of Dentin Hypersensitivity (DH).

Material and methodology: A sample of 73 teeth from 13 patients, among which at least 3 teeth had dentin hypersensitivity, was randomly allocated into 3 treatment groups: Group A: treated with 30% ethenolic extract of Indian Propolis, Group B: treated with GC tooth mousse, and Group C: treated with sterile water. A Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) was used to record the degree of hypersensitivity, based on patient's response to tactile and air blast stimuli. The baseline scores were obtained. Each intervention group received applications of their respective agents consecutively on 1(st), 7(th), 14(th) and 21(st) days. After each application, the scores were recorded.

Results: Both the 30% Indian Propolis and GC tooth mousse showed significant reductions in dentin hypersensitivity.

Conclusion: GC tooth mousse was found to be significantly better in reducing the dentinal hypersensitivity as compared to Propolis and sterile water (p< 0.01).

Keywords: Dentin hypersensitivity; GC tooth mousse; Indian Propolis; Split mouth; VRS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

[Table/Fig-1]:
[Table/Fig-1]:
Showing the total number of teeth distributed in each group

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Porto Isabel CCM, Andrade Ana KM, Montes Marcos AJR. Diagnosis and treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Oral Sciences. 2009;51:323–32. - PubMed
    1. Lussi A, Schaffner M. Progression of and risk factors for dental erosion and wedge-shaped over a 6-year period. Caries Res. 2000;34:182–7. - PubMed
    1. Prasad KVV, Sohoni R, Tikare S, Yalamalli M, Rajesh G, Javali SB. Efficacy of two commercially available dentifrices in reducing dentinal hypersensitivity. Indian J Dent Res. 2010;21:224–30. - PubMed
    1. Walter PA. Dentinal hypersensitivity: A review. J Contemporary Dent Practice. 2005;6:1–10. - PubMed
    1. Murray LE, Roberts AJ. The prevalence of self-reported hypersensitive teeth. Arch Oral Biol. 1994;39:129–35.

LinkOut - more resources