Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov 4;2(1):30.
doi: 10.1186/2047-2994-2-30.

Rapid detection of glycopeptide-resistant enterococci: impact on decision-making and costs

Affiliations

Rapid detection of glycopeptide-resistant enterococci: impact on decision-making and costs

Gabriel Birgand et al. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. .

Abstract

Background: According to French national recommendations, the detection of a patient colonized with glycopeptide-resistant enterococci (GRE) leads to interruption of new admissions and transfer of contact patients (CPs) to another unit or healthcare facility, with weekly screening of CPs.

Findings: We evaluated the medical and economic impact of a pragmatic adaptation of national guidelines associated with a real-time PCR (RTP) (Cepheid Xpert™ vanA/vanB) as part of the strategy for controlling GRE spread in two medical wards. Screening was previously performed using chromogenic selective medium (CSM). Turn around time (TAT), costs of tests and cost of missed patient days were prospectively collected. In February 2012, the identification of GRE in one patient in the diabetology ward led to the screening of 31 CPs using CSM; one secondary case was identified in a CP already transferred to the Nephrology ward. Awaiting the results of SCM (median TAT, 70.5 h), 41 potential patient days were missed, due to interruption of admissions. The overall cost (screening tests + missing patient.days) was estimated at 14, 302.20 €. The secondary case led to screening of 22 CPs in the Nephrology ward using RTP. Because of a short median TAT of 4.6 h, we did not interrupt admissions and patients' transfers. Among 22 CPs, 19 (86%) were negative for vanA, 2 were positive for vanB and 3 had invalid results needing CSM. The overall cost of the strategy was estimated at 870.40 € (cost of screening tests only), without missing patient days.

Conclusion: The rapid PCR test for vanA-positive GRE detection both allowed rapid decision about the best infection control strategy and prevented loss of income due to discontinuation of patient transfers and admissions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Jett BD, Huycke MM, Gilmore MS. Virulence of enterococci. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1994;7(4):462–478. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cookson BD, Macrae MB, Barrett SP, Brown DF, Chadwick C, French GL, Hateley P, Hosein IK, Wade JJ. Guidelines for the control of glycopeptide-resistant enterococci in hospitals. J Hosp Infect. 2006;62(1):6–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.02.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC issues recommendations for preventing spread of vancomycin resistance. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1995;52(12):1272–1274. - PubMed
    1. HCSP. Rapport relatif à la maîtrise de l’émergence et de la diffusion des entérocoques résistants aux glycopeptides (ERG) dans les établissements de santé français. 2009. http://www.hcsp.fr/Explore.cgi/Telecharger?NomFichier=hcspr20090219_ERG.pdf.
    1. EARSS. European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System. 2010. http://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/healthtopics/antimicrobial_resistance/Pages... 2011(2010 annual report)

LinkOut - more resources