Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr;13(2):107-14.
doi: 10.1017/S1478951513000862. Epub 2013 Nov 4.

Sources and types of online information that breast cancer patients read and discuss with their doctors

Erin K Maloney  1 , Thomas A D'Agostino  2 , Alexandra Heerdt  2 , Maura Dickler  2 , Yuelin Li  2 , Jamie S Ostroff  2 , Carma L Bylund  2
Affiliations

Sources and types of online information that breast cancer patients read and discuss with their doctors

Erin K Maloney et al. Palliat Support Care. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: Most research examining the impact of patients seeking online health information treats internet information homogenously, rather than recognizing that there are multiple types and sources of available information. The present research was conducted to differentiate among sources and types of internet information that patients search for, intend to discuss with their doctors, and recall discussing with their doctors, and to determine how accurate and hopeful patients rate this information.

Methods: We surveyed 70 breast cancer patients recruited from the waiting rooms of breast medical oncology and surgery clinics. The main variables in the study were as follows: (1) the sources and types of online information patients have read, intended to discuss, and actually discussed with their doctors, and (2) how accurately and hopefully they rated this information to be.

Results: Patients read information most frequently from the websites of cancer organizations, and most often about side effects. Patients planned to discuss fewer types of information with their doctors than they had read about. They most often intended to discuss information from cancer organization websites or WebMD, and the material was most often about alternative therapies, side effects, and proven or traditional treatments. Some 76.8% of total participants rated the information they had read as very or somewhat accurate, and 61% rated the information they had read as very or somewhat hopeful.

Significance of results: Internet information varies widely by source and type. Differentiating among sources and types of information is essential to explore the ways in which online health information impacts patients' experiences.

Keywords: Trusted health sources.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Screening schema and results.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bass SB, Ruzek SB, Gordon TF, et al. Relationship of internet health information use with patient behavior and self-efficacy: Experiences of newly diagnosed cancer patients who contact the National Cancer Institute’s Cancer Information Service. Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives. 2006;11(2):219–236. - PubMed
    1. Bennett-Clark J. Where health information is byte-size: Online advice can help you manage health cost. Kiplinger’s Personal Finance. 1996:96–97.
    1. Burstein HJ. Commentary on “Internet usage among women with breast cancer: An exploratory study. Clinical Breast Cancer. 2000;1(2):154–155. - PubMed
    1. Bylund CL, Sabee CM, Imes RS, et al. Exploration of the construct of reliance among patients who talk with their providers about internet information. Journal of Health Communication. 2007;12(1):17–28. - PubMed
    1. Bylund CL, Gueguen JA, D’Agostino TA, et al. Cancer patients’ decisions about discussing internet information with their doctors. Psycho-Oncology. 2009;18:1139–1146. - PubMed

Publication types