Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jan 1;5(1):170-8.
doi: 10.4161/viru.26906. Epub 2013 Nov 1.

Neonatal sepsis: an old problem with new insights

Affiliations
Review

Neonatal sepsis: an old problem with new insights

Birju A Shah et al. Virulence. .

Abstract

Neonatal sepsis continues to be a common and significant health care burden, especially in very-low-birth-weight infants (VLBW<1500 g). Though intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis has decreased the incidence of early-onset group B streptococcal infection dramatically, it still remains a major cause of neonatal sepsis. Moreover, some studies among VLBW preterm infants have shown an increase in early-onset sepsis caused by Escherichia coli. As the signs and symptoms of neonatal sepsis are nonspecific, early diagnosis and prompt treatment remains a challenge. There have been a myriad of studies on various diagnostic markers like hematological indices, acute phase reactants, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, cytokines, and cell surface markers among others. Nonetheless, further research is needed to identify a biomarker with high diagnostic accuracy and validity. Some of the newer markers like inter α inhibitor proteins have shown promising results thereby potentially aiding in early detection of neonates with sepsis. In order to decrease the widespread, prolonged use of unnecessary antibiotics and improve the outcome of the infants with sepsis, reliable identification of sepsis at an earlier stage is paramount.

Keywords: algorithms; antibiotic prophylaxis; biomarkers; epidemiology; group B streptococcus; microbiology; neonatal sepsis; newer tests; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Camacho-Gonzalez A, Spearman PW, Stoll BJ. Neonatal infectious diseases: evaluation of neonatal sepsis. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2013;60:367–89. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2012.12.003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bizzarro MJ, Raskind C, Baltimore RS, Gallagher PG. Seventy-five years of neonatal sepsis at Yale: 1928-2003. Pediatrics. 2005;116:595–602. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0552. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hornik CP, Fort P, Clark RH, Watt K, Benjamin DK, Jr., Smith PB, Manzoni P, Jacqz-Aigrain E, Kaguelidou F, Cohen-Wolkowiez M. Early and late onset sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants from a large group of neonatal intensive care units. Early Hum Dev. 2012;88(Suppl 2):S69–74. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3782(12)70019-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gerdes JS. Diagnosis and management of bacterial infections in the neonate. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2004;51:939–59, viii-ix. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2004.03.009. [viii-ix.] - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bonadio WA, Hennes H, Smith D, Ruffing R, Melzer-Lange M, Lye P, Isaacman D. Reliability of observation variables in distinguishing infectious outcome of febrile young infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993;12:111–4. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199302000-00001. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms