Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Oct 31;10(11):5629-70.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph10115629.

Domestic asbestos exposure: a review of epidemiologic and exposure data

Emily Goswami  1 , Valerie Craven, David L Dahlstrom, Dominik Alexander, Fionna Mowat
Affiliations
Review

Domestic asbestos exposure: a review of epidemiologic and exposure data

Emily Goswami et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Inhalation of asbestos resulting from living with and handling the clothing of workers directly exposed to asbestos has been established as a possible contributor to disease. This review evaluates epidemiologic studies of asbestos-related disease or conditions (mesothelioma, lung cancer, and pleural and interstitial abnormalities) among domestically exposed individuals and exposure studies that provide either direct exposure measurements or surrogate measures of asbestos exposure. A meta-analysis of studies providing relative risk estimates (n = 12) of mesothelioma was performed, resulting in a summary relative risk estimate (SRRE) of 5.02 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.48-10.13). This SRRE pertains to persons domestically exposed via workers involved in occupations with a traditionally high risk of disease from exposure to asbestos (i.e., asbestos product manufacturing workers, insulators, shipyard workers, and asbestos miners). The epidemiologic studies also show an elevated risk of interstitial, but more likely pleural, abnormalities (n = 6), though only half accounted for confounding exposures. The studies are limited with regard to lung cancer (n = 2). Several exposure-related studies describe results from airborne samples collected within the home (n = 3), during laundering of contaminated clothing (n = 1) or in controlled exposure simulations (n = 5) of domestic exposures, the latter of which were generally associated with low-level chrysotile-exposed workers. Lung burden studies (n = 6) were also evaluated as a surrogate of exposure. In general, available results for domestic exposures are lower than the workers' exposures. Recent simulations of low-level chrysotile-exposed workers indicate asbestos levels commensurate with background concentrations in those exposed domestically.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies of mesothelioma in domestically exposed populations.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Lung-burden studies.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Wagner J.C., Sleggs C.A., Marchand P. Diffuse pleural mesothelioma and asbestos exposure in the north western Cape Province. Brit. J. Ind. Med. 1960;17:260–271. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Newhouse M.L., Thompson H. Epidemiology of mesothelial tumors in the London area. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1965;132:579–588. - PubMed
    1. Newhouse M.L., Thompson H. Mesothelioma of pleura and peritoneum following exposure to asbestos in the London area. Brit. J. Ind. Med. 1965;22:261–269. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vianna N.J., Polan A.K. Non-occupational exposure to asbestos and malignant mesothelioma in females. Lancet. 1978;1:1061–1063. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(78)90911-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDonald A.D., McDonald J.C. Malignant mesothelioma in North America. Cancer. 1980;46:1650–1656. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources