Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct 1;32(5):10.1007/s11113-013-9280-y.
doi: 10.1007/s11113-013-9280-y.

Declining Segregation of Same-Sex Partners: Evidence from Census 2000 and 2010

Affiliations

Declining Segregation of Same-Sex Partners: Evidence from Census 2000 and 2010

Amy L Spring. Popul Res Policy Rev. .

Abstract

Despite recent media and scholarly attention describing the "disappearance" of traditionally gay neighborhoods, urban scholars have yet to quantify the segregation of same-sex partners and determine whether declining segregation from different-sex partners is a wide-spread trend. Focusing on the 100 most populous places in the United States, I use data from the 2000 and 2010 Decennial Census to examine the segregation of same-sex partners over time and its place-level correlates. I estimate linear regression models to examine the role of four place characteristics in particular: average levels of education, aggregate trends in the family life cycle of same-sex partners, violence and social hostility motivated by sexual orientation bias, and representation of same-sex partners in the overall population. On average, same-sex partners were less segregated from different-sex partners in 2010 than in 2000, and the vast majority of same-sex partners lived in environments of declining segregation. Segregation was lower and declined more rapidly in places that had a greater percentage of graduate degree holders. In addition, segregation of female partners was lower in places that had a greater share of female partner households with children. These findings suggest that sexual orientation should be considered alongside economic status, race, and ethnicity as an important factor that contributes to neighborhood differentiation and urban spatial inequality.

Keywords: Gay and lesbian population; Neighborhoods; Residential segregation; Same-sex partners; Sexual orientation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Cities with the highest and lowest segregation of male same-sex partners from different-sex partners
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Cities with the highest and lowest segregation of female same-sex partners from different-sex partners

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adler S, Brenner J. Gender and space: Lesbians and gay men in the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 1992;16(1):24–34.
    1. Advocate. [Accessed 24 April 2007];The Advocate Poll. 2007 :10.
    1. Ahmed AM, Hammarstedt M. Detecting discrimination against homosexuals: Evidence from a field experiment on the internet. Economica. 2009;76(303):588–597.
    1. Allport GW. The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1954.
    1. Anacker KB, Morrow-Jones HA. Neighborhood factors associated with same-sex households in US cities. Urban Geography. 2005;26(5):385–409.

LinkOut - more resources