Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep 25:2013:272086.
doi: 10.1155/2013/272086. eCollection 2013.

The effect of gold and iron-oxide nanoparticles on biofilm-forming pathogens

Affiliations

The effect of gold and iron-oxide nanoparticles on biofilm-forming pathogens

Madhu Bala Sathyanarayanan et al. ISRN Microbiol. .

Abstract

Microbial biofilms on biomaterial implants or devices are hard to eliminate by antibiotics due to their protection by exopolymeric substances that embed the organisms in a matrix, impenetrable for most antibiotics and immune-cells. Application of metals in their nanoparticulated form is currently considered to resolve bacterial infections. Gold and iron-oxide nanoparticles are widely used in different medical applications, but their utilisation to eradicate biofilms on biomaterials implants is novel. Here, we studied the effect of gold and iron oxide nanoparticles on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. We report that biofilm growth was reduced at higher concentrations of gold and iron-oxide nanoparticles compared to absence of nanoparticles. Thus nanoparticles with appropriate concentration could show significant reduction in biofilm formation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Transmission electron micrographs of (a) gold and (b) iron-oxide nanoparticles. Inset images show the synthesized nanoparticles. (b)(B) shows the magnetic property of iron-oxide nanoparticles. Bar denotes 5 nm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
UV-visible spectrum of (a) gold and (b) iron-oxide nanoparticles.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Biofilm formation of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa after 24 h of growth in the presence of gold and iron-oxide nanoparticles (0.01 mg/mL).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Percentage change in biofilm growth in the presence of gold nanoparticles (0.01 mg/mL, 0.05 mg/mL, 0.10 mg/mL, and 0.15 mg/mL) with respect to biofilm growth in the absence of nanoparticles (control). Error bar represents the standard deviations over three replicates, with separately cultured bacteria. #, ∗ denote significance at differences at P < 0.01 compared with 0.01 mg/mL.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Percentage change in biofilm growth in the presence of iron-oxide nanoparticles (0.01 mg/mL, 0.05 mg/mL, 0.10 mg/mL, and 0.15 mg/mL) with respect to biofilm growth in the absence of nanoparticles (control). Error bar represents the standard deviations over three replicates, with separately cultured bacteria. #, ∗ denote significance at differences at P < 0.01 compared with 0.01 mg/mL.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Costerton JW. Introduction to biofilm. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 1999;11(3-4):217–221. - PubMed
    1. Gradinger R, Graf R, Grifka J, Löhr J. Das infezierte implantat. Der Orthopäde. 2008;3:257–269. - PubMed
    1. Mehta A, Rosenthal VD, Mehta Y, et al. Device-associated nosocomial infection rates in intensive care units of seven Indian cities. Findings of the international nosocomial infection control consortium (INICC) Journal of Hospital Infection. 2007;67(2):168–174. - PubMed
    1. Gristina AG. Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration. Science. 1987;237(4822):1588–1595. - PubMed
    1. Martineau L, Davis SC. Controlling methicillin resistant Staphyloccocus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound infections with a novel biomaterial. Journal of Investigative Surgery. 2007;20(4):217–227. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources