Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993 Oct;87(1-2):129-35.
doi: 10.1007/BF00223756.

Phylogenetic relationships of turfgrasses as revealed by restriction fragment analysis of chloroplast DNA

Affiliations

Phylogenetic relationships of turfgrasses as revealed by restriction fragment analysis of chloroplast DNA

M Yaneshita et al. Theor Appl Genet. 1993 Oct.

Abstract

Chloroplast DNAs (cpDNAs) were analyzed in order to clarify the phylogenetic relationships among turfgrasses. Physical maps of cpDNAs from Agrostis stolonifera and Zoysia japonica, which are representative species of cool (C3 type) and warm (C4 type) season turfgrasses, respectively, were constructed with four restriction enzymes, i.e., PstI, SalI, SacI, and XhoI. The genome structures of these cpDNAs were found to be similar to each other in terms of genome size and gene orders, showing thereby a similarity to other grass cpDNAs. CpDNAs of 5 species of cool season turfgrasses and 6 species of warm season turfgrasses as well as four species of cereals, distributed among 14 genera of Gramineae, were digested with PstI, XhoI, and BamHI, and their restriction fragment patterns were compared. Their genome sizes were estimated to be 135-140 kbp. Each species showed characteristic RFLP patterns. On the basis of the frequency of commonly shared fragments, a dendrogram showing the phylogenetic relationships among their cpDNAs was constructed. This dendrogram shows that turfgrasses can be divided into three major groups; these correspond to the subfamilies. Cool and warm season turfgrasses are clearly distinguishable from each other, and the latter can be further classified into two subgroups that correspond to Eragrostoideae and Panicoideae. Our classification of turfgrasses and cereals by RFLP analysis of cpDNA agreed in principal with their conventional taxonomy, except for the location of Festuca and Lolium.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Theor Appl Genet. 1987 Jul;74(3):298-302 - PubMed
    1. Mol Gen Genet. 1989 Jun;217(2-3):185-94 - PubMed
    1. Curr Genet. 1988 Apr;13(4):343-9 - PubMed
    1. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Oct 25;13(20):7207-21 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jun;85(11):3898-902 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources