Patient engagement programs for recognition and initial treatment of depression in primary care: a randomized trial
- PMID: 24193079
- PMCID: PMC4493759
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.280038
Patient engagement programs for recognition and initial treatment of depression in primary care: a randomized trial
Abstract
Importance: Encouraging primary care patients to address depression symptoms and care with clinicians could improve outcomes but may also result in unnecessary treatment.
Objective: To determine whether a depression engagement video (DEV) or a tailored interactive multimedia computer program (IMCP) improves initial depression care compared with a control without increasing unnecessary antidepressant prescribing.
Design, setting, and participants: Randomized clinical trial comparing DEV, IMCP, and control among 925 adult patients treated by 135 primary care clinicians (603 patients with depression and 322 patients without depression, defined by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] score) conducted from June 2010 through March 2012 at 7 primary care clinical sites in California.
Interventions: DEV targeted to sex and income, an IMCP tailored to individual patient characteristics, and a sleep hygiene video (control).
Main outcomes and measures: Among depressed patients, superiority assessment of the composite measure of patient-reported antidepressant drug recommendation, mental health referral, or both (primary outcome); depression at 12-week follow-up, measured by the PHQ-8 (secondary outcome). Among nondepressed patients, noninferiority assessment of clinician- and patient-reported antidepressant drug recommendation (primary outcomes) with a noninferiority margin of 3.5%. Analyses were cluster adjusted.
Results: Of the 925 eligible patients, 867 were included in the primary analysis (depressed, 559; nondepressed, 308). Among depressed patients, rates of achieving the primary outcome were 17.5% for DEV, 26% for IMCP, and 16.3% for control (DEV vs control, 1.1 [95% CI, -6.7 to 8.9], P = .79; IMCP vs control, 9.9 [95% CI, 1.6 to 18.2], P = .02). There were no effects on PHQ-8 measured depression score at the 12-week follow-up: DEV vs control, -0.2 (95% CI, -1.2 to 0.8); IMCP vs control, 0.9 (95% CI, -0.1 to 1.9). Among nondepressed patients, clinician-reported antidepressant prescribing in the DEV and IMCP groups was noninferior to control (mean percentage point difference [PPD]: DEV vs control, -2.2 [90% CI, -8.0 to 3.49], P = .0499 for noninferiority; IMCP vs control, -3.3 [90% CI, -9.1 to 2.4], P = .02 for noninferiority); patient-reported antidepressant recommendation did not achieve noninferiority (mean PPD: DEV vs control, 0.9 [90% CI, -4.9 to 6.7], P = .23 for noninferiority; IMCP vs control, 0.3 [90% CI, -5.1 to 5.7], P = .16 for noninferiority).
Conclusions and relevance: A tailored IMCP increased clinician recommendations for antidepressant drugs, a mental health referral, or both among depressed patients but had no effect on mental health at the 12-week follow-up. The possibility that the IMCP and DEV increased patient-reported clinician recommendations for an antidepressant drug among nondepressed patients could not be excluded.
Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01144104.
Figures

Comment in
-
Patient engagement programs and treatment of depression.JAMA. 2014 Mar 19;311(11):1158-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.576. JAMA. 2014. PMID: 24643610 No abstract available.
-
Patient engagement programs and treatment of depression--reply.JAMA. 2014 Mar 19;311(11):1159-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.579. JAMA. 2014. PMID: 24643612 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Targeted versus tailored multimedia patient engagement to enhance depression recognition and treatment in primary care: randomized controlled trial protocol for the AMEP2 study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr 17;13:141. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-141. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013. PMID: 23594572 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The effect of targeted and tailored patient depression engagement interventions on patient-physician discussion of suicidal thoughts: a randomized control trial.J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Aug;29(8):1148-54. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2843-8. Epub 2014 Apr 8. J Gen Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24710994 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of Computer-Assisted Cognitive Behavior Therapy vs Usual Care on Depression Among Adults in Primary Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2146716. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46716. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 35142833 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Novel Augmentation Strategies in Major Depression.Dan Med J. 2017 Apr;64(4):B5338. Dan Med J. 2017. PMID: 28385173 Review.
-
What role for cognitive remediation in the treatment of depressive symptoms? A superiority and noninferiority meta-analysis for clinicians.Depress Anxiety. 2022 Jul;39(7):586-606. doi: 10.1002/da.23263. Epub 2022 May 10. Depress Anxiety. 2022. PMID: 35536033 Review.
Cited by
-
Patient engagement as a risk factor in personalized health care: a systematic review of the literature on chronic disease.Genome Med. 2014 Feb 26;6(2):16. doi: 10.1186/gm533. eCollection 2014. Genome Med. 2014. PMID: 24571651 Free PMC article.
-
Sociopsychological tailoring to address colorectal cancer screening disparities: a randomized controlled trial.Ann Fam Med. 2014 May-Jun;12(3):204-14. doi: 10.1370/afm.1623. Ann Fam Med. 2014. PMID: 24821891 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
'You feel like your whole world is caving in': A qualitative study of primary care patients' conceptualisations of emotional distress.Health (London). 2017 May;21(3):295-315. doi: 10.1177/1363459316674786. Epub 2016 Oct 1. Health (London). 2017. PMID: 28177273 Free PMC article.
-
Trends, challenges, and priorities for shared decision making in mental health: The first umbrella review.Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;69(4):823-840. doi: 10.1177/00207640221140291. Epub 2023 Jan 20. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 36680367 Free PMC article.
-
Stakeholder views regarding a planned primary care office-based interactive multimedia suicide prevention tool.Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Feb;102(2):332-339. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 8. Patient Educ Couns. 2019. PMID: 30220599 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Berardi D, Menchetti M, Cevenini N, Scaini S, Versari M, De Ronchi D. Increased recognition of depression in primary care. Comparison between primary-care physician and ICD-10 diagnosis of depression. Psychotherapy and psychosomatics. 2005;74(4):225–230. - PubMed
-
- Lotfi L, Flyckt L, Krakau I, Martensson B, Nilsson GH. Undetected depression in primary healthcare: occurrence, severity and co-morbidity in a two-stage procedure of opportunistic screening. Nordic journal of psychiatry. 2010 Dec;64(6):421–427. - PubMed
-
- Simon GE, Fleck M, Lucas R, Bushnell DM, Group L. Prevalence and predictors of depression treatment in an international primary care study. The American journal of psychiatry. 2004 Sep;161(9):1626–1634. - PubMed
-
- Unutzer J, Katon W, Callahan CM, et al. Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 2002 Dec 11;288(22):2836–2845. - PubMed
-
- Wells KB. Caring for depression in primary care: defining and illustrating the policy context. The Journal of clinical psychiatry. 1997;58(Suppl 1):24–27. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical