Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Apr;23(4):954-60.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2755-x. Epub 2013 Nov 7.

Comparison of tendon-bone healing between autografts and allografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using magnetic resonance imaging

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of tendon-bone healing between autografts and allografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using magnetic resonance imaging

Yunshen Ge et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to compare tendon-bone healing between autograft tendons and allograft tendons after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging.

Methods: A total of 36 participants (18 with autograft and 18 with allograft reconstruction) underwent MRI scans at least 2 years after the ACL reconstruction operation. Oblique axial images were obtained on three-dimensional dual-echo steady-state images and imported into solid modelling software for three-dimensional model reconstruction of the bone tunnel. The graft signal intensity in the tunnel, tendon-bone interface, tunnel morphology, and tunnel area was analysed using the Siemens software packages to determine the tendon-bone healing between the groups.

Results: For the tunnel morphology, both groups exhibited bone tunnel enlargement either at the femoral or tibial tunnel aperture. For the tendon-bone interface, one patient in the autograft group and two patients in the allograft group exhibited a significant fibrous scar tissue bands at the tendon-bone interface. The graft signal/noise quotient values of the allograft group were higher than the autograft group. However, there was no significant difference in the tunnel area between the allograft group and the autograft group.

Conclusions: Although the autograft tendons exhibited a better remodelling effect than did the allograft tendons in the bone tunnel, there was no significant difference in the tendon-bone healing between the autograft tendons and the allograft tendons postoperatively. These findings indicate that the biomechanical effect of graft motion may play a significant role in the tunnel aperture.

Level of evidence: III.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jul;40(7):1519-26 - PubMed
    1. J Orthop Surg Res. 2010 Aug 21;5:59 - PubMed
    1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 Apr;15(4):365-71 - PubMed
    1. Arthroscopy. 2012 Apr;28(4):517-25 - PubMed
    1. J Surg Res. 2010 Jun 15;161(2):282-7 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources