Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar 3:2:13-8.
doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S16665. eCollection 2011.

Pre- and postmarathon training habits of nonelite runners

Angela M Voight  1 , William O Roberts, Scott Lunos, Lisa S Chow
Affiliations

Pre- and postmarathon training habits of nonelite runners

Angela M Voight et al. Open Access J Sports Med. .

Abstract

Background: Despite the increasing popularity of marathons, little research has examined the training habits of nonelite marathon runners. Given that nonelite runners, particularly those with a competitive motive, have a higher risk for injury than experienced elite runners, it is important for physicians to understand the training program and features that might distinguish running performance and injury rates in this population.

Hypothesis: We hypothesized that nonelite runners who qualify for the Boston Marathon ("qualifers") would have higher running volumes, more running sessions per week, lower injury rates, and lower body mass index (BMI) than nonqualifying runners.

Study design: A cross-sectional Web-based survey of runners (convenience sample) at 1 month (n = 50) and 6 months (n = 41) after participation in the 2008 Twin Cities Marathon (TCM) that acquired data on anthropometric measures, demographic data, finishing time, premarathon/current training program, and self-reported injury.

Results: Thirteen of 50 initial survey respondents were classified as a "qualifier" based on their finishing time. Mean BMI was significantly lower in the qualifiers at 1 month (22.0 versus 23.9 kg/m(2), P = 0.0267) but not 6 months postmarathon. There were no significant differences in training volume (running frequency, run length, or cross-training volume) or injury rates between qualifiers and nonqualifiers. Prior to the 2008 TCM, 54% of runners included cross-training in their exercise program, which increased significantly to 74% 1 month postmarathon (P = 0.0039) and 71% 6 months postmarathon (P = 0.0325). There was no association between cross-training and injury rates.

Conclusions: Nonelite marathon runners had a high degree of cross-training in their training program. Qualifiers for the Boston Marathon did not significantly differ in running frequency, run length, or cross-training volume compared with nonqualifiers. Whether changes in the training program at an individual level might facilitate a change in qualifying status remains to be determined.

Keywords: BMI; cross-training; marathon; training.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Running USA Inc Running USA Annual Marathon Report http://www.runningusa.org/node/57770#57771Accessed December 1, 2010
    1. Satterthwaite P, Norton R, Larmer P, Robinson E. Risk factors for injuries and other health problems sustained in a marathon. Br J Sports Med. 1999;33(1):22–26. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marti B, Vader JP, Minder CE, Abelin T. On the epidemiology of running injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1988;16(3):285–294. - PubMed
    1. Arrese AL, Ostariz ES. Skinfold thicknesses associated with distance running performance in highly trained runners. J Sports Sci. 2006;24(1):69–76. - PubMed
    1. Larsen HB. Kenyan dominance in distance running. Comp Biochem Physiol Mol Integr Physiol. 2003;136(1):161–170. - PubMed