Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov 1:4:813.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00813. eCollection 2013.

The NR-6: a new brief measure of nature relatedness

Affiliations

The NR-6: a new brief measure of nature relatedness

Elizabeth K Nisbet et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The construct of (dis)connection with nature or "nature relatedness" has become increasingly useful in the study of environmental behavior as well as psychological health and well-being. Strong nature relatedness is associated with greater happiness and ecologically sustainable behavior. A number of scales reliably assess individual differences in nature relatedness, but some circumstances may necessitate a brief measure. We developed a short-form version of the nature relatedness scale (NR-6), comprised of 6 items from the "self" and "experience" dimensions, and tested the new scale's predictive ability across multiple samples and with longitudinal data in students, community members, and business people. The new NR-6 scale demonstrated good internal consistency, temporal stability, and predicted happiness, environmental concern, and nature contact. This new brief measure of connectedness may have advantages where time and space are limited and the research context requires an assessment of connectedness elements rather than environmental attitudes.

Keywords: environmental attitudes; happiness; nature relatedness; scale development; subjective well-being; sustainable behavior.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Berman M., Jonides J., Kaplan S. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychol. Sci. 19, 1207–1212 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown K. W., Kasser T. (2005). Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness and lifestyle. Soc. Indic. Res. 74, 349–368 10.1007/s11205-004-8207-8 - DOI
    1. Clayton S. (2003). Environmental identity: a conceptual and operational definition, in Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature, eds Clayton S., Opotow S. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; ), 45–65
    1. Conn S. (1998). Living in the earth: ecopsychology, health and psychotherapy. Humanist. Psychol. 26, 179–198 10.1080/08873267.1998.9976972 - DOI
    1. Diener E. (2000). Subjective well-being: the science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. Am. Psychol. 55, 34–43 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources