Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Nov 1:4:819.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00819.

Human olfactory consciousness and cognition: its unusual features may not result from unusual functions but from limited neocortical processing resources

Affiliations
Review

Human olfactory consciousness and cognition: its unusual features may not result from unusual functions but from limited neocortical processing resources

Richard J Stevenson et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Human and animal olfactory perception is shaped both by functional demands and by various environmental constraints seemingly peculiar to chemical stimuli. These demands and constraints may have generated a sensory system that is cognitively distinct from the major senses. In this article we identify these various functional demands and constraints, and examine whether they can be used to account for olfaction's unique cognitive features on a case-by-case basis. We then use this as grounds to argue that specific conscious processes do have functional value, a finding that naturally emerges when a comparative approach to consciousness across the senses is adopted. More generally, we conclude that certain peculiar features of olfactory cognition may owe more to limited neocortical processing resources, than they do to the challenges faced by perceiving chemical stimuli.

Keywords: comparative; consciousness; cross-modal; function; olfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. American Medical Asociation [AMA]. (1993). Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 4th Edn Chicago, IL: AMA
    1. Andrade J., Donaldson L. (2007). Evidence for an olfactory store in working memory? Psychologia 50, 76–89 10.2117/psysoc.2007.76 - DOI
    1. Ashkenazi A., Marks L. E. (2004). Effect of endogenous attention on detection of weak gustatory and olfactory flavors. Percept. Psychophys. 66, 596–608 10.3758/BF03194904 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ashton R., White K. D. (1980). Sex differencers in imagery vividness: an artefact of the test. Br. J. Psychol. 71, 35–38 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1980.tb02726.x - DOI
    1. Auffarth B. (2013). Understanding smell—the olfactory stimulus problem. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37, 1667–1679 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.009 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources