Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun 23:2012:301.
eCollection 2012.

Nursing audit as a method for developing nursing care and ensuring patient safety

Affiliations

Nursing audit as a method for developing nursing care and ensuring patient safety

Minna Mykkänen et al. NI 2012 (2012). .

Abstract

Nursing documentation is crucial to high quality, good and safe nursing care. According to earlier studies nursing documentation varies and the nursing classifications used in electronic patient records (EPR) is not yet stable internationally nor nationally. Legislation on patient records varies between countries, but they should contain accurate, high quality information for assessing, planning and delivering care. A unified national model for documenting patient care would improve information flow, management between multidisciplinary care teams and patient safety. Nursing documentation quality, accuracy and development needs can be monitored through an auditing instrument developed for the national documentation model. The results of the auditing process in one university hospital suggest that the national nursing documentation model fulfills nurses' expectations of electronic tools, facilitating their important documentation duty. This paper discusses the importance of auditing nursing documentation and especially of giving feedback after the implementation of a new means of documentation, to monitor the progress of documentation and further improve nursing documentation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Results of the audits of CCU nursing documentation in spring 2010, autumn 2010 and spring 2011.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Results of the audits of KUS nursing documentation audits in 2010 and 2011.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Heartfield M. Nursing documentation and nursing practice: a discourse analysis. J adv nurs. 1996;24:98–103. - PubMed
    1. Urquhart C, Currell R, Grant MJ, Hardiger NR. Nursing record systems: effects on nursing practise and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane database syat. rev. 2009;(1) doi: 10.1002/14651858. art. no.;cd002099.pub2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saranto K, Kinnunen U-M. Evaluating nursing documentation – research designs and methods: systematic review. Journal of advanced nursing. 65(3):464–476. - PubMed
    1. Waneka R, Spetz J. Hospital information technology systems, impact on nurses and nursing care. The journal of nursing administration. 40(12):509–515. - PubMed
    1. Häyrinen K, Saranto K, Nykänen P. Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records. International journal of medical informatics. 2008;79:291–304. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources